Re: Additional recommendation from the FO council on charter wording

Hi Amy,

thank you for that. I've updated the "For example" line to change MAY to may as the minimum acceptable change, for now.

kind regards,

Nigel
________________________________
From: rhiaro <amy@rhiaro.co.uk>
Sent: 03 December 2022 11:10 AM
To: public-tt@w3.org <public-tt@w3.org>
Subject: Additional recommendation from the FO council on charter wording

Hi all,

I chaired the FO Council which discussed the FO to the TTWG proposed
charter recently. The outcome of the council was to continue to try to
build consensus around updated charter wording. Proposed wording was
drafted during the council meeting, and you have probably already seen
that Nigel has made a PR to the charter with it [1].

Due to an oversight when composing the resolutions of the council
meeting, I neglected to include the additional proposal to remove the
"for example" sentence in 3.1, to further reduce ambiguity in the
charter language, in particular as normative language ("MAY") is out of
place in an example.

I'll do a suggested change on the PR with this addition. Apologies for
the lateness of this extra change, and to those who have already
approved the PR.

Take care,

Amy

[1] https://github.com/w3c/charter-timed-text/pull/84