Additional recommendation from the FO council on charter wording

Hi all,

I chaired the FO Council which discussed the FO to the TTWG proposed 
charter recently. The outcome of the council was to continue to try to 
build consensus around updated charter wording. Proposed wording was 
drafted during the council meeting, and you have probably already seen 
that Nigel has made a PR to the charter with it [1].

Due to an oversight when composing the resolutions of the council 
meeting, I neglected to include the additional proposal to remove the 
"for example" sentence in 3.1, to further reduce ambiguity in the 
charter language, in particular as normative language ("MAY") is out of 
place in an example.

I'll do a suggested change on the PR with this addition. Apologies for 
the lateness of this extra change, and to those who have already 
approved the PR.

Take care,

Amy

[1] https://github.com/w3c/charter-timed-text/pull/84

Received on Saturday, 3 December 2022 11:11:13 UTC