Re: {Minutes} TTWG Meeting 2020-10-01 - Consensus for resolutions following review period

On 2020/11/19 20:07, Nigel Megitt wrote:
> That's great, thank you Atsushi. I see that the process added back in a "previous version" link to the front matter, which we'd removed. That's a bit strange but not a huge problem. Any idea how that happened?


   mm.. haven't noticed on that, also I have no idea on this, sorry.
   output generated from W3CMANIFEST does not include that line:
https://w3c.github.io/tt-profile-registry/index.html?specStatus=WG-NOTE&shortName=ttml-profile-registry
but extracted metadata (in output from echidna) contains previousVersion. so, one possibility
is that echidna adds options of previous* in addition to ones specified in W3CMANIFEST
automatically...


> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Atsushi Shimono (W3C Team)
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 19, 2020 7:58 AM
> *To:* public-tt@w3.org
> *Subject:* Re: {Minutes} TTWG Meeting 2020-10-01 - Consensus for resolutions following review period
> 
> 
> 
> On 2020/10/31 02:43, Nigel Megitt wrote:
>> With apologies for the delay, as Chair I declare that, the review period being complete, we have consensus on the two resolutions agreed on 1^st October:
>> 
>> 1.*Resolution:*we publish the current ED of TTML Profiles Registry as a WG Note subject to editorial changes (e.g. update ReSpec)
>> 
>> 2.Adopt /history in place of Previous Version for all future publications #145 <https://github.com/w3c/ttwg/issues/145 <https://github.com/w3c/ttwg/issues/145>>
>> 
>> *Atsushi*, I have just opened https://github.com/w3c/tt-profile-registry/pull/81 <https://github.com/w3c/tt-profile-registry/pull/81> <https://github.com/w3c/tt-profile-registry/pull/81 <https://github.com/w3c/tt-profile-registry/pull/81>> to add the /history link to the front matter of the TTML Profiles registry. That needs a pull request review approval before GitHub will permit it to be merged, but once that is done and merged please could you go ahead and publish a new version of this WG Note as per this resolution above?
>> 
>> We will need similar pull requests on other specifications to add the /history links too.
> 
>     sorry for taking time to check PR on this,,, and is merged just three days ago.
> 
>     I've executed:
> curl 'https://labs.w3.org/echidna/api/request <https://labs.w3.org/echidna/api/request>' --data 'url=https://w3c.github.io/tt-profile-registry/W3CTRMANIFEST&decision=https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2020Oct/0018.html&token=<token>'
> 
> and successfully resulted as:
> page in /TR/: https://www.w3.org/TR/2020/NOTE-ttml-profile-registry-20201119/ <https://www.w3.org/TR/2020/NOTE-ttml-profile-registry-20201119/>
> command output: https://labs.w3.org/echidna/api/status?id=4782aa8e-8407-482e-af43-052e6910e92d <https://labs.w3.org/echidna/api/status?id=4782aa8e-8407-482e-af43-052e6910e92d>