{Minutes} TTWG Meeting 2020-03-26

Thanks all for attending today's TTWG meeting. Minutes can be found in HTML format at https://www.w3.org/2020/03/26-tt-minutes.html


Please note that we made 1 Resolution<https://www.w3.org/2020/03/26-tt-minutes.html#r01>:

Resolution: Change "Latest IMSC1 Recommendation" to "Latest IMSC Recommendation" and point to the rec link in 3 current documents: 1.0.1 REC, 1.1 REC and 1.2 CR

The review period for this Resolution under the group's Decision Policy expires on 2020-04-09.

Those minutes in text format:

   [1]W3C

      [1] https://www.w3.org/


                Timed Text Working Group Teleconference

26 March 2020

   [2]Previous meeting. [3]Agenda. [4]IRC log.

      [2] https://www.w3.org/2020/03/19-tt-minutes.html

      [3] https://github.com/w3c/ttwg/issues/102

      [4] https://www.w3.org/2020/03/26-tt-irc


Attendees

   Present
          Andreas, Atsushi, Cyril, Gary, Glenn, Nigel, Pierre

   Regrets
          -

   Chair
          Gary, Nigel

   Scribe
          cyril, nigel

Contents

    1. [5]This meeting
    2. [6]IMSC 1.2
    3. [7]TTML2 2nd Edition Implementation Report
    4. [8]Minor Charter updates
    5. [9]Calendar files in agendas
    6. [10]Arranging joint session with PING
    7. [11]imsc/rec link
    8. [12]Meeting close
    9. [13]Summary of resolutions

Meeting minutes

   <atsushi> (will join after i18n WG call ends,,, hope in short
   time)

  This meeting

   nigel: looking light today
   … IMSC1.2, TTML2 2nd ed IR
   … and some AOBs
   … to alert people to minor tweaks in the charter

   <atsushi> AOB+ added [14]https://www.w3.org/TR/ttml-imsc/rec

   and it points to [15]https://www.w3.org/TR/ttml-imsc1.1/ (got
   right now)

     [14] https://www.w3.org/TR/ttml-imsc/rec

     [15] https://www.w3.org/TR/ttml-imsc1.1/


   nigel: thanks to atsushi for preparing calendar files
   … and about a joint session with PING
   … any other business that other people want to add?

   atsushi: I pasted it on IRC a new link
   … which points to the latest IMSC spec

  IMSC 1.2

   nigel: the main news is we published CR
   … thanks everybody

   <nigel> [16]IMSC 1.2 CR

     [16] https://www.w3.org/TR/2020/CR-ttml-imsc1.2-20200324/


   nigel: we do expect to have an empty IR
   … because it's a profile
   … and the tests are already in TTML2
   … we do have some editorial changes
   … Pierre, any concern from an editorial perspective?

   pal: yes
   … my first concern is that I've not heard back from the
   commenter
   … it's been 2 weeks ago

   nigel: on accessibility?

   pal: yes
   … it could all be that this was confusion due to the spec not
   being clear
   … a potential solution could be to add an introduction
   … really editorial but some work
   … I don't know how to get the commenter back

   nigel: Given it's been a couple of weeks it's fine for me to
   poke that group

   pal: If we meet with PING, we might do the same with APA

   nigel: I'll propose that
   … would you rather try and schedule that during the call or as
   a separate call?

   pal: this is going to be detailed so not necessary to be in the
   call

   cyril: we are not very busy in the calls these days, we could
   use them

   atai: agree

   nigel: for PING we may need a different time
   … but for APA, I'll offer that time

   nigel: other issues on IMSC1.2?
   … similar concerns?

   pal: no, the rest, I don't foresee any issue
   … thanks again to everybody for getting to CR

  TTML2 2nd Edition Implementation Report

   nigel: thanks Glenn for the work on the tests
   … I'm now up to date on all but 1
   … the one I haven't managed to comment on is the one audio in
   body
   … I'm aware that I'm going to be on the hook for providing
   implementation
   … and I want to make sure our implementation is working
   … my review approach has been checking the spec changes
   … and that the tests match something sensible with the spec

   glenn: you found a couple of good issues to fix, thanks
   … I have a couple of minor issues to deal with
   … early next week should be fixed

   nigel: I'll keep reviewing them

   glenn: you should be able to get one set of implementations
   through TTT next week
   … I haven't checked other implementations

   nigel: I encourage everybody else to have a look at the current
   PR
   … the more eyes the better

   cyril: anybody looked at the draft IR?

   glenn: not yet

   cyril: probably needs updating based on the new PRs

   glenn: I'll get to that probably early next week

   <nigel> [17]TTML2 2nd Ed IR

     [17] https://www.w3.org/wiki/TimedText/TTML2SecondEditionImplementationReport


   nigel: with those pull requests, we add various test files, so
   we need to do a second pass
   … anything else on TTML2?

  Minor Charter updates

   nigel: somehow we published the charter with "fix me" comments
   in the charter document
   … atsushi noticed them and made some changes

   atsushi: the changes are already live now

   nigel: the changes section at the end and the team contact have
   been changed
   … no need for approval from the team
   … this is an informative item
   … questions?

  Calendar files in agendas

   nigel: you might have noticed that this agenda included a link
   , in the time section to a *.ics file
   … when we discussed the DST switch, someone suggested that we
   should have a calendar reminder
   … we can now easily do it, thanks to Atsushi
   … it seems to be possible to create an ICS with multiple
   meetings or per meeting
   … the multiple meetings in one file did not work for me
   … have a look
   … every agenda issue has one of these things in it
   … it's early days, any feedback is useful

   <atsushi> [18]https://calendar.google.com/calendar/

   embed?src=23takkp7lmcssc6b6ggmpr7m1mhfac2d%40import.calendar.go
   ogle.com&ctz=Asia%2FTokyo

     [18] https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=23takkp7lmcssc6b6ggmpr7m1mhfac2d@import.calendar.google.com&ctz=Asia/Tokyo


   cyril: not sure it's that useful if the file changes every
   meeting

   pal: agree with cyril

   atsushi: I pasted into IRC, the one I added to my calendar
   … you may get several events

   [19]https://calendar.google.com/calendar/

   embed?src=23takkp7lmcssc6b6ggmpr7m1mhfac2d%40import.calendar.go
   ogle.com&ctz=Asia%2FTokyo

     [19] https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=23takkp7lmcssc6b6ggmpr7m1mhfac2d@import.calendar.google.com&ctz=Asia/Tokyo


   cyril: I don't have permission to view

   <atsushi> [20]https://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/wip/meetings.ics


     [20] https://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/wip/meetings.ics


   nigel: you need to be logged in Google

   pal: I've just tried to add the ICS file and we'll see if it
   works

   gkatsev: it looks like there is a way to make recurrent events
   in ICS
   … the issue is that you have to do it manually

   <gkatsev> [21]ics reccurance rules

     [21] https://icalendar.org/iCalendar-RFC-5545/3-8-5-3-recurrence-rule.html


   nigel: Is there general feeling that 1 ICS file with recurrence
   rule would be useful?

   atsushi: until the next DST change it could work
   … but I'm worried about recurrence after the next DST change

   <nigel> [22]TimeAndDate ICS generator

     [22] https://www.timeanddate.com/scripts/ics.php?type=utc&p1=1440&iso=20200326T16


   nigel: I could look at timeanddate creating the ICS

  Arranging joint session with PING

   nigel: pete said that he cannot make our time

   nigel: what I'm tempted to do is suggest the hour afterwards

   pal: I'll be available next week at the hour following the
   meeting

   nigel: nice, for European folks that would be an hour later
   … for US, it would be the same hour as today

   nigel: I'll go back to PING and propose that

  imsc/rec link

   nigel: IMSC1.1 has a link to latest IMSC1 recommendation

   <nigel> [23]IMSC 1.1 has a link to "Latest IMSC1
   recommendation:"

     [23] https://www.w3.org/TR/ttml-imsc1.1/


   nigel: and it points to [24]https://www.w3.org/TR/

   ttml-imsc1.0.1/

     [24] https://www.w3.org/TR/ttml-imsc1.0.1/


   <nigel> [25]is where it points

     [25] https://www.w3.org/TR/ttml-imsc1/


   nigel: resolves to IMSC 1.0.1
   … but I'm really expecting 1.1
   … and when we publish 1.2 it should point to that

   pal: yes, the link is broken

   nigel: atsushi made some changes

   <nigel> [26]New "latest" link

     [26] https://www.w3.org/TR/ttml-imsc/rec


   atsushi: the /rec link is new and points to the latest
   recommendation of IMSC

   <nigel> [27]where it resolves to today

     [27] https://www.w3.org/TR/ttml-imsc1.1/


   atsushi: regardless of the version of TTML IMSC
   … now it is pointing to 1.1

   nigel: thanks
   … the proposal is that we do replacement of the latest IMSC1
   link in IMSC1.1 to point to that /rec
   … I think that's possible to do in-place

   atsushi: yes

   cyril: we also need to change the link in 1.0.1

   nigel: yes

   cyril: and also the 1.0 spec

   [28]https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/REC-ttml-imsc1-20160421/


     [28] https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/REC-ttml-imsc1-20160421/


   nigel: there is also a banner that tells you it's outdated
   which points to IMSC1.0.1
   … 1.0.1 is still out and is not superseeded

   <atsushi> [29]https://www.w3.org/TR/ttml-imsc1.0/


     [29] https://www.w3.org/TR/ttml-imsc1.0/


   cyril: we should be clear that the latest IMSC1.0 is 1.0.1 but
   the latest IMSC is 1.1 and soon 1.2

   nigel: right

   cyril: we need 2 links: latest 1.0 spec and latest IMSC

   pal: people who have kept a link to 1.0 and got there, see it's
   outdated, they should get a link to 1.0.1

   nigel: agree
   … I think where it says "Latest IMSC1 Recommendation" we need
   to say "Latest IMSC Recommendation" and point to the rec link
   … that change applies to 3 current document: 1.0.1 REC, 1.1 REC
   and 1.2 CR

   cyril: agree, but what do we do this link [30]http://
   www.w3.org/TR/ttml-imsc1/?
   … because strictly speaking the latest is 1.1 or 1.2

     [30] http://www.w3.org/TR/ttml-imsc1/?


   pal: historically, IMSC1 was IMSC1.0
   … maybe it's not perfect, but not completely broken

   nigel: if we change the link pointed to by [31]http://
   www.w3.org/TR/ttml-imsc1/ we would need to change 1.0 and
   1.0.1, and that's extra work
   … my inclination is not to do this extra work

     [31] http://www.w3.org/TR/ttml-imsc1/


   atsushi: I need a WG agreement and resolution

   Resolution: Change "Latest IMSC1 Recommendation" to "Latest
   IMSC Recommendation" and point to the rec link in 3 current
   documents: 1.0.1 REC, 1.1 REC and 1.2 CR

   nigel: in 1.2 we could wait for PR but it's confusing

   atsushi: from a process point of view, there is no edited CR

   pal: in the past, we made such minor changes without going
   through the process

   nigel: let's try to do the resolution and revisit if we have a
   problem

   atsushi: I will draft an email and CC Nigel

  Meeting close

   Nigel: Thanks everyone, that's our agenda completed, apologies
   we're 2 minutes over.
   … [adjourns meeting]

Summary of resolutions

    1. [32]Change "Latest IMSC1 Recommendation" to "Latest IMSC
       Recommendation" and point to the rec link in 3 current
       documents: 1.0.1 REC, 1.1 REC and 1.2 CR


    Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
    [33]scribe.perl version 114 (Tue Mar 17 13:45:45 2020 UTC).

     [33] https://w3c.github.io/scribe2/scribedoc.html

Received on Thursday, 26 March 2020 17:20:14 UTC