RE: Reducing meeting cadence was: {Draft Agenda} TTWG Meeting 2020-12-03

It may be an option to add alternative communication channels for our groups
work. Especially in recent months chat channels similar to Slack or
Microsoft Teams have been proven to be very effective. They could be an
efficient alternative to some conference calls.

 

Best regards,

Andreas

 

From: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> 
Sent: Donnerstag, 3. Dezember 2020 10:53
To: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>; Gary Katsevman
<gkatsevman@brightcove.com>
Cc: TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Reducing meeting cadence was: {Draft Agenda} TTWG Meeting
2020-12-03

 

Hi Pierre,

 

thanks for this. I agree that we need to discuss something here; I would
frame the question slightly differently. For me, it's about the momentum we
have in working on our planned deliverables. Our meeting cadence should
match the amount of work we need to discuss. I don't think this is very
different from what you're suggesting, but I would rather have more things
to discuss!

 

Happy to add it to the agenda.

 

kind regards,

 

Nigel

 

--

 

Nigel Megitt

Executive Product Manager, BBC Design & Engineering

Telephone : +44 (0)3030807996 

BC5 A3 Broadcast Centre, Media Village, 201 Wood Lane, London W12 7TP

 

  _____  

From: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com <mailto:pal@sandflow.com> >
Sent: 02 December 2020 8:55 PM
To: Gary Katsevman <gkatsevman@brightcove.com
<mailto:gkatsevman@brightcove.com> >; Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk
<mailto:nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> >
Cc: TTWG <public-tt@w3.org <mailto:public-tt@w3.org> >
Subject: Reducing meeting cadence was: {Draft Agenda} TTWG Meeting
2020-12-03 

 

Hi Nigel, Gary et al.,

I suggest adding the following topic to the agenda:

"""Should the frequency of TTWG telecons be reduced in absence of
major upcoming deliverables?"""

Maintenance items, e.g. fixing IMSC tests, can be done offline through
github.

I would think a monthly cadence should be sufficient to tackle the
occasional controversial/complex topic and/or as a forcing function.

Best,

-- Pierre

On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 10:16 AM Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk
<mailto:nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> > wrote:
>
> Our weekly teleconference will go ahead tomorrow, duration 1 hour.
>
> Agenda: https://github.com/w3c/ttwg/issues/161
>
> Draft summary agenda:
>
> 1. This meeting
> 2. IMSC open pull requests
> 2.1 Add test for tts:textEmphasis='auto' w3c/imsc-tests#91
> 2.2 Create rubyReserve004.ttml w3c/imsc-tests#93
> 2.3 Create rubyReserve005 w3c/imsc-tests#94
> 2.4 Added nested and referential styling priority test w3c/imsc-tests#97
> 3. MPEG Liaison regarding ISO/IEC 14496-30 (carriage of TTML in MP4) #167
> 3. Patent Policy 2020
> 4. AOB - please notify of any other AOB now!
>
> Time
>
> 16:00 - 17:00 (1 hours) UTC
>
> Please be ready for a prompt start at 16:03am UTC time.
>
> Our teleconference is scheduled with reference to UTC Time, the correct
time of this teleconference in your locale may change.
>
> Check
https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20201203T16
<https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20201203T16&p1=14
40> &p1=1440
>
> Calendar for this meeting:
https://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/wip/meeting-20201126.ics
>
> Joining details:
>
> see https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-tt/2016Oct/0009.html
> (members-only link - if you can't see this and wish to join please contact
me)
>
> Future meetings and recent activity:
>
> See the TTWG project board for upcoming meetings.
>
> See individual agenda items for recent activity on specific products.
>
> See the TTWG home page for links to repositories and recent activity.
>
>