Re: Republishing WebVTT as CR with features at risk (CfC)

I'd like to see Gary added as author. 😀

On Fri., 15 Mar. 2019, 4:52 am Philippe Le Hégaret, <plh@w3.org> wrote:

> The proposal from today's call is to update the WebVTT in /TR as a CR
> with the following list of features at:
> [[
> collision avoidance with snap-to-lines false
> ::cue-region pseudo-element
> :past and :future pseudo-classes
> ]]
>
> The draft document prepared by Gary is at:
>
>
> https://raw.githack.com/w3c/webvtt/90265659a7b01fafba5e464f40ccbf781c6fdaa3/archives/2019-03-06/Overview.html
>
> If anyone objects to update the draft, please speak up before the TT
> call on March 28.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Philippe
>
> On 3/14/2019 1:20 PM, Nigel Megitt wrote:
> > WebVTT Implementation Report
> >
> >     Gary: I sent out an update last week. I started working on
> >     STYLE block implementation for vtt.js so with Safari's
> >     implementation
> >     ... and that then the feature will no longer be at risk.
> >     ... I made a pull request against the repo marking a couple of
> >     things at risk so we can move forward with getting those
> >     ... things out as a new CR. Then hopefully we can remove those
> >     features, move that to a PR and create a new CR with
> >     ... those features put back in.
> >
> >     Nigel: Can we do that or do we have to go back to WD?
> >
> >     Philippe: You can do it if you can demonstrate wide review and
> >     the Director approves. That would need a transition request.
> >
> >     Gary: That part can be done at another meeting. Is the marking
> >     things at risk something that everyone is in agreement
> >     ... on, removing those features and moving that version
> >     forward?
> >     ... I got a comment from Eric saying he was in agreement with
> >     that assuming we put the features back in later.
> >
> >     Nigel: We have a Chairing vacuum here which as ever I'm
> >     reluctant to step in to.
> >     ... We need consensus on this and a CfC for publishing a CR.
> >
> >     Philippe: Is there any objection?
> >
> >     Nigel: Our Decision Policy is 2 weeks. The pull request
> >     decision policy began when the pull was opened, arguably.
> >     ... We still need a document to review with a proposal to
> >     publish as an updated CR.
> >
> >     Gary: I believe the updated snapshot is what we want to
> >     publish.
> >     ... We don't need to remove the at risk features yet.
> >
> >     Philippe: I guess we need a separate CfC email sent to the list
> >     to start the 2 weeks period.
> >
> >     Nigel: That's what we normally do.
> >
> >     Philippe: The proposal is to update the document as per the
> >     pull request. Can we have a link to the document generated
> >     ... by the pull request?
> >
> >     Gary: No
> >
> >     Philippe: We need pr preview enabled.
> >
> >     Nigel: Will you take that offline to send a proposal to the WG
> >     Philippe?
> >
> >     Philippe: Yes I will do
> >
> >     Nigel: Thank you
> >
> > TTWG Charter 2019
> >
> >     Nigel: Please do review the pull requests on the Charter repo
> >
> >     <plh>
> >     [15]https://raw.githack.com/w3c/webvtt/90265659a7b01fafba5e464f
> >     40ccbf781c6fdaa3/archives/2019-03-06/Overview.html
> >
> >       [15]
> https://raw.githack.com/w3c/webvtt/90265659a7b01fafba5e464f40ccbf781c6fdaa3/archives/2019-03-06/Overview.html
> >
> >     [16]Charter pull requests
> >
> >       [16] https://github.com/w3c/charter-timed-text/pulls
> >
> > Meeting close
> >
> >     group: [discussion about enabling PR preview on VTT repo]
> >
> >     Nigel: We're out of time for today, thank you everyone.
> >     [adjourns meeting]
> >
> > Summary of Action Items
> >
> > Summary of Resolutions
> >
> >     [End of minutes]
> >       __________________________________________________________
> >
> >
> >      Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
> >      David Booth's [17]scribe.perl version 1.154 ([18]CVS log)
> >      $Date: 2019/03/14 17:15:50 $
> >
> >       [17] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
> >       [18] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------
> >
> > http://www.bbc.co.uk
> > This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain
> personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically
> stated.
> > If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
> > Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in
> reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
> > Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
> > Further communication will signify your consent to this.
> >
> > ---------------------
> >
>
>