- From: Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 13:52:21 -0400
- To: Timed Text Working Group <public-tt@w3.org>
- Cc: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
The proposal from today's call is to update the WebVTT in /TR as a CR with the following list of features at: [[ collision avoidance with snap-to-lines false ::cue-region pseudo-element :past and :future pseudo-classes ]] The draft document prepared by Gary is at: https://raw.githack.com/w3c/webvtt/90265659a7b01fafba5e464f40ccbf781c6fdaa3/archives/2019-03-06/Overview.html If anyone objects to update the draft, please speak up before the TT call on March 28. Thank you, Philippe On 3/14/2019 1:20 PM, Nigel Megitt wrote: > WebVTT Implementation Report > > Gary: I sent out an update last week. I started working on > STYLE block implementation for vtt.js so with Safari's > implementation > ... and that then the feature will no longer be at risk. > ... I made a pull request against the repo marking a couple of > things at risk so we can move forward with getting those > ... things out as a new CR. Then hopefully we can remove those > features, move that to a PR and create a new CR with > ... those features put back in. > > Nigel: Can we do that or do we have to go back to WD? > > Philippe: You can do it if you can demonstrate wide review and > the Director approves. That would need a transition request. > > Gary: That part can be done at another meeting. Is the marking > things at risk something that everyone is in agreement > ... on, removing those features and moving that version > forward? > ... I got a comment from Eric saying he was in agreement with > that assuming we put the features back in later. > > Nigel: We have a Chairing vacuum here which as ever I'm > reluctant to step in to. > ... We need consensus on this and a CfC for publishing a CR. > > Philippe: Is there any objection? > > Nigel: Our Decision Policy is 2 weeks. The pull request > decision policy began when the pull was opened, arguably. > ... We still need a document to review with a proposal to > publish as an updated CR. > > Gary: I believe the updated snapshot is what we want to > publish. > ... We don't need to remove the at risk features yet. > > Philippe: I guess we need a separate CfC email sent to the list > to start the 2 weeks period. > > Nigel: That's what we normally do. > > Philippe: The proposal is to update the document as per the > pull request. Can we have a link to the document generated > ... by the pull request? > > Gary: No > > Philippe: We need pr preview enabled. > > Nigel: Will you take that offline to send a proposal to the WG > Philippe? > > Philippe: Yes I will do > > Nigel: Thank you > > TTWG Charter 2019 > > Nigel: Please do review the pull requests on the Charter repo > > <plh> > [15]https://raw.githack.com/w3c/webvtt/90265659a7b01fafba5e464f > 40ccbf781c6fdaa3/archives/2019-03-06/Overview.html > > [15] https://raw.githack.com/w3c/webvtt/90265659a7b01fafba5e464f40ccbf781c6fdaa3/archives/2019-03-06/Overview.html > > [16]Charter pull requests > > [16] https://github.com/w3c/charter-timed-text/pulls > > Meeting close > > group: [discussion about enabling PR preview on VTT repo] > > Nigel: We're out of time for today, thank you everyone. > [adjourns meeting] > > Summary of Action Items > > Summary of Resolutions > > [End of minutes] > __________________________________________________________ > > > Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by > David Booth's [17]scribe.perl version 1.154 ([18]CVS log) > $Date: 2019/03/14 17:15:50 $ > > [17] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm > [18] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/ > > > > > > > ---------------------------- > > http://www.bbc.co.uk > This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. > If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. > Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. > Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. > Further communication will signify your consent to this. > > --------------------- >
Received on Thursday, 14 March 2019 17:52:25 UTC