- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 19:50:50 -0600
- To: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
- Cc: Cyril Concolato <cconcolato@netflix.com>, TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACQ=j+cO5qbbj=H+MSy+1BrOsj_epp6n=Bm8WhefyTFj17E3yQ@mail.gmail.com>
Actually, we have not yet moved the information from the temporary spread sheet on google docs [1] to the final resting place for the IR [2], which has not been updated since we started using the former. I expect to move this data to [2] over the next week or so, at which point we can add descriptive information. [1] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1gtUAV0r4Zd1NUSEcFclBqOrk41pOyaOTfaLxc7boBeQ/edit#gid=0 [2] https://www.w3.org/wiki/TTML/TTML2ImplementationReport On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 7:28 PM, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com> wrote: > Hi Glenn, > > > I think it isn't necessary to discuss this, since we are not relying on > any of the 'S' passes to satisfy the exit criteria. > > My concerns would be addressed if this were documented in the > implementation report. Did I miss it? > > Best, > > -- Pierre > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 6:13 PM Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 5:45 PM, Cyril Concolato <cconcolato@netflix.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Thanks Pierre. Some comments below. >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 4:19 PM Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Cyril, >>>> >>>> > Do you have precise aspects for which you want careful review? >>>> >>>> Yes: >>>> >>>> - finalize the TTML1 3ED exit criteria tests [1] >>>> >>> The PR seems to be approved by Nigel. There is a comment by Glenn but >>> thee does not seem to be objection. Can we merge it? Or are you expecting >>> something else? >>> >>> >>>> - identify and resolve gaps in the TTML1 3ED implementation report [6] >>>> >>> I see 2 concerns: >>> - The fact that TTPE and ttval columns are empty >>> - the fact that the font size tests are not passing >>> Any other concern? What do you suggest? >>> >>> >>> >>>> - review the definitions of "strictly pass" and "fully pass" at [2] in >>>> the context of the TTML2 exit criteria >>>> >>> What exactly do you mean? Would you prefer having just pass or fail, no >>> intermediate value? >>> >> >> I think it isn't necessary to discuss this, since we are not relying on >> any of the 'S' passes to satisfy the exit criteria. >> >> >>> >>> >>>> - finalize the TTML2 exit criteria tests [ed.: [3] provides a list for >>>> validation tests. I do not see a comparable list for presentation tests, >>>> and two of the presentation tests are at [4] while the others are >>>> presumably at [5].] >>>> >>> I'm not sure I get it. Are you requesting a JSON file for the >>> presentation tests? >>> >> >> I will create a tests.json that can be used for a manifest for the >> presentation tests. All of the presentation tests for TTML2 are in [5], >> there are none in [4]. >> >> >>> >>> >>>> - identify and resolve gaps in the TTML2 implementation report >>>> >>> Can you elaborate? Are you concerned about the features that currently >>> don't fulfill the exit criteria? Or is it more than that? Any suggestion? >>> >> >> I believe we only need to discuss https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/issues/990. >> The other remaining non-green features for presentation will be satisfied >> by TTPE before Sep 26. >> >> >>> >>> >>>> - review the IMSC 1.1 implementation report [7] >>>> >>> It seems pretty straight-forward. Do you foresee any problem with that? >>> >>> Cyril >>> >>> >>> >>>> [1] https://github.com/w3c/ttml1/pull/361 >>>> [2] https://github.com/w3c/ttml2-tests/blob/master/README.md >>>> [3] https://github.com/w3c/ttml2-tests/blob/master/validation/ >>>> tests.json >>>> [4] https://github.com/w3c/imsc-tests/pull/67 >>>> [5] https://github.com/w3c/ttml2-tests/tree/master/presentation >>>> [6] https://www.w3.org/wiki/TTML1-3ED_implementation_report >>>> [7] https://www.w3.org/wiki/TimedText/IMSC1_1_Implementation_Report >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> -- Pierre >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 4:03 PM Cyril Concolato <cconcolato@netflix.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Pierre, >>>>> >>>>> Do you have precise aspects for which you want careful review? >>>>> >>>>> Cyril >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 3:24 PM Pierre-Anthony Lemieux < >>>>> pal@sandflow.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Good morning/evening, >>>>>> >>>>>> Although already included in the agenda, I recommend we carefully >>>>>> review the exit criteria and test suites for the following documents: >>>>>> >>>>>> - TTML1 3ED >>>>>> - TTML 2 >>>>>> - IMSC 1.1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Time is running short to make course corrections. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> >>>>>> -- Pierre >>>>>> >>>>> >>
Received on Thursday, 13 September 2018 01:51:34 UTC