Re: Agenda items re: CR exit criteria

Thanks Pierre. Some comments below.

On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 4:19 PM Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
wrote:

> Hi Cyril,
>
> > Do you have precise aspects for which you want careful review?
>
> Yes:
>
> - finalize the TTML1 3ED exit criteria tests [1]
>
The PR seems to be approved by Nigel. There is a comment by Glenn but thee
does not seem to be objection. Can we merge it? Or are you expecting
something else?


> - identify and resolve gaps in the TTML1 3ED implementation report [6]
>
I see 2 concerns:
- The fact that TTPE and ttval columns are empty
- the fact that the font size tests are not passing
Any other concern? What do you suggest?



> - review the definitions of "strictly pass" and "fully pass" at [2] in the
> context of the TTML2 exit criteria
>
What exactly do you mean? Would you prefer having just pass or fail, no
intermediate value?


> - finalize the TTML2 exit criteria tests [ed.: [3] provides a list for
> validation tests. I do not see a comparable list for presentation tests,
> and two of the presentation tests are at [4] while the others are
> presumably at [5].]
>
I'm not sure I get it. Are you requesting a JSON file for the presentation
tests?


> - identify and resolve gaps in the TTML2 implementation report
>
Can you elaborate? Are you concerned about the features that currently
don't fulfill the exit criteria? Or is it more than that? Any suggestion?


> - review the IMSC 1.1 implementation report [7]
>
 It seems pretty straight-forward. Do you foresee any problem with that?

Cyril



> [1] https://github.com/w3c/ttml1/pull/361
> [2] https://github.com/w3c/ttml2-tests/blob/master/README.md
> [3] https://github.com/w3c/ttml2-tests/blob/master/validation/tests.json
> [4] https://github.com/w3c/imsc-tests/pull/67
> [5] https://github.com/w3c/ttml2-tests/tree/master/presentation
> [6] https://www.w3.org/wiki/TTML1-3ED_implementation_report
> [7] https://www.w3.org/wiki/TimedText/IMSC1_1_Implementation_Report
>
> Best,
>
> -- Pierre
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 4:03 PM Cyril Concolato <cconcolato@netflix.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Pierre,
>>
>> Do you have precise aspects for which you want careful review?
>>
>> Cyril
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 3:24 PM Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Good morning/evening,
>>>
>>> Although already included in the agenda, I recommend we carefully review
>>> the exit criteria and test suites for the following documents:
>>>
>>> - TTML1 3ED
>>> - TTML 2
>>> - IMSC 1.1
>>>
>>> Time is running short to make course corrections.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> -- Pierre
>>>
>>