Re: Agenda items re: CR exit criteria

Hi Cyril,

> Do you have precise aspects for which you want careful review?

Yes:

- finalize the TTML1 3ED exit criteria tests [1]
- identify and resolve gaps in the TTML1 3ED implementation report [6]
- review the definitions of "strictly pass" and "fully pass" at [2] in the
context of the TTML2 exit criteria
- finalize the TTML2 exit criteria tests [ed.: [3] provides a list for
validation tests. I do not see a comparable list for presentation tests,
and two of the presentation tests are at [4] while the others are
presumably at [5].]
- identify and resolve gaps in the TTML2 implementation report
- review the IMSC 1.1 implementation report [7]

[1] https://github.com/w3c/ttml1/pull/361
[2] https://github.com/w3c/ttml2-tests/blob/master/README.md
[3] https://github.com/w3c/ttml2-tests/blob/master/validation/tests.json
[4] https://github.com/w3c/imsc-tests/pull/67
[5] https://github.com/w3c/ttml2-tests/tree/master/presentation
[6] https://www.w3.org/wiki/TTML1-3ED_implementation_report
[7] https://www.w3.org/wiki/TimedText/IMSC1_1_Implementation_Report

Best,

-- Pierre


On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 4:03 PM Cyril Concolato <cconcolato@netflix.com>
wrote:

> Hi Pierre,
>
> Do you have precise aspects for which you want careful review?
>
> Cyril
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 3:24 PM Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Good morning/evening,
>>
>> Although already included in the agenda, I recommend we carefully review
>> the exit criteria and test suites for the following documents:
>>
>> - TTML1 3ED
>> - TTML 2
>> - IMSC 1.1
>>
>> Time is running short to make course corrections.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> -- Pierre
>>
>