On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 7:21 PM, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote:
>
> On 12-May-18 16:20, Glenn Adams wrote:
>
>> Nigel,
>>
>> Could you formally ask W3M or CSSWG why the published WD of the Ruby
>> Module has not been updated in approximately 4 years? What is preventing
>> the publishing of a new WD?
>>
>
> W3M is unlikely to have an answer, but CSS WG will and the editors
> (copied) even more so.
>
> The latest Editors Draft is 20 March 2018, so development is ongoing
> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ruby-1/
>
> There are 18 open issues and 7 closed
> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/labels/css-ruby-1
>
> The changes (broad-brush, not very detailed) since the last WD:
> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ruby-1/#changes
>
>
>> TTML2 references the (quite old) WD [1], but we really would like it to
>> be updated to a current ED [2].
>>
>> If you are happy referencing an ED, I suggest you do so.
>
> If you need a /TR snapshot (and are happy referencing a WD), what are your
> timeline constraints?
I am targeting a PR release of TTML2 by 1 August, so a WD before that would
be great. What is the problem with publishing a WD with open issues?
>
>
> --
> Chris Lilley
> @svgeesus
> Technical Director @ W3C
> W3C Strategy Team, Core Web Design
> W3C Architecture & Technology Team, Core Web & Media
>
>
>