Re: Call for Consensus to publish WebVTT as a Candidate Recommendation

Hi Pierre,

That link is here:
https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/w3c/webvtt/blob/gh-pages/archives/2018-04-15/changes.html
.
Also the diff is here:
https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/w3c/webvtt/blob/gh-pages/archives/2018-04-15/diff.html
.

These will be correct when published to the official W3C TR site
because they are relative links. The <base> URL was introduced by
htmlpreview which is why they are not rendering directly in the
subdirectory.

Note that in WebVTT we put the snapshots into an "archive" directory
rather than keeping additional branches open. That reduces confusion
in the GitHub repository between what is a branch with data for PR and
what is the actual committed content. I still believe it is correct
since work on the specification is done by both. That this snapshot is
being processed by the TTWG should not make a difference to this
statement, IMHO.

Kind Regards,
Silvia.

About that extra paragraph: it's not up to me to change it - it was
provided like that by Thierry.



On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 6:52 AM, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux
<pal@sandflow.com> wrote:
> Hi Silvia,
>
> This does not seem right:
>
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/webvtt/gh-pages/archives/2018-04-15/changes.html
>
> Also, can the following be removed since the specification is now
> managed by TTWG:
>
> """
> Work on this specification is being undertaken both in the Web Media
> Text Tracks Community Group as well as in the W3C Timed Text Working
> Group. The latter group works towards a W3C Recommendation for
> reference purposes with interoperability requirements, while the
> former is a Draft Community Group Report that continues to evolve.
> """
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Pierre
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 12:47 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
> <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> David jumped the gun with his email a little - Thierry and I first
>> needed to land that pull request.
>>
>> You can find the proper link at
>> https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/w3c/webvtt/blob/gh-pages/archives/2018-04-15/Overview.html
>> .
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>> Silvia.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 3:43 AM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote:
>>> Thierry wrote the status of this document, not me.
>>>
>>> I think he also has a better URL for it, but I can’t find it.
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Mar 30, 2018, at 9:23 , Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi David et al.,
>>>>
>>>> This document is not hosted on the W3C github repo? Why not simply
>>>> create a CR branch at https://github.com/w3c/webvtt ?
>>>>
>>>> Also, the following paragraph should be removed since this
>>>> specification is managed by TTWG exclusively at this point -- the CG
>>>> has no control over it.
>>>
>>> No formal control, indeed, but we are trying (and so far succeeding) to avoid forks and differences, so I prefer to keep the paragraph.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> """Work on this specification is being undertaken both in the Web
>>>> Media Text Tracks Community Group as well as in the W3C Timed Text
>>>> Working Group. The latter group works towards a W3C Recommendation for
>>>> reference purposes with interoperability requirements, while the
>>>> former is a Draft Community Group Report that continues to evolve."""
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> -- Pierre
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 9:16 AM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote:
>>>>> [sending again as plain text in case the HTML format was hiding a spurious link]
>>>>>
>>>>> All,
>>>>>
>>>>> following this week's call giving conceptual approval pending the preparation of the CR document, and the preparation by Thierry and Silvia of the CR draft at <https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/silviapfeiffer/webvtt-spec/blob/f8da4f27205ed2c11b7dedbf46d91b363eaafe9b/archives/2018-04-15/Overview.html> is now ready for us to request transition to Candidate Recommendation: I think that the obvious typo in “Diff from previous” has been or will imminently be fixed. This email is a call for consensus to make the transition based on this version of the document; barring any objections within the WG's Decision Policy period of 10 working days as defined in the Charter, I will ask for this transition request to be made.
>>>>>
>>>>> (Thierry/Silvia, if there is a better link, let us know)
>>>>>
>>>>> For transition request purposes, assuming no objections, I will record this as a resolution in the minutes of the next call.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please review the document and if possible confirm that you agree with this resolution; silence will be taken as acceptance, but an explicit approval would be much appreciated.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you spot any problems please raise issues as normal on the GitHub repository. We can make minor editorial fixes such as typo fixes any time.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks to everyone who contributed to the push to get to this state over the last few months: this represents a lot of hard work.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> kind regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> David
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> David Singer
>>> Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
>>>

Received on Friday, 30 March 2018 20:01:41 UTC