- From: Cyril Concolato <cconcolato@netflix.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 16:01:27 -0800
- To: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
- Cc: TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMiyXwDRpJdNqJj-4cmQ+v+hEgoP4JKd47dntU1FK_TN5VtSYA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Pierre, Sure. Generally speaking, we are giving ourselves too much work in porting/backporting fixes from all our specs, with the risk of divergence. We are also making it hard for people outside the community to follow what's happening. Are we going to maintain IMSC1.0, 1.0.1 and 1.1 for ever? Given the backward compatibility, when are we going to replace IMSC1.0.1 by IMSC1.1 and tell our users to update their specs? In the meantime, we could agree to use the same Git repo, with different branches to be able to merge changes, do diffs ... Note that the same remark/question applies to TTML1 and TTML2. Cyril On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 3:47 PM, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com> wrote: > Good morning/evening, > > The following are editorial commits (and PRs) that have been (will be) > applied to the CR of IMSC1.0.1. I suggest applying them to IMSC1.1 > without further review. > > https://github.com/w3c/imsc/commit/db6ca9fa7ae5e418c8fbfb09107c35 > a087cc35af > https://github.com/w3c/imsc/commit/b70025d7efd83edd5782f5566d4b57 > a87c1269aa > https://github.com/w3c/imsc/commit/97c568a067efd220a7e99350a2d4b5 > a3d9b16b73 > https://github.com/w3c/imsc/commit/fb9f7d46ea5e7887586dd6fcec75ce > aac3fd47a7 > https://github.com/w3c/imsc/commit/11280a723ce7ef140437e2712451e0 > 6af1d754f9 > https://github.com/w3c/imsc/pull/309 > https://github.com/w3c/imsc/pull/306 > https://github.com/w3c/imsc/pull/304 > > Best, > > -- Pierre > >
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2018 00:28:15 UTC