- From: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 16:18:30 +0000
- To: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>, TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
Thanks Pierre, Sounds like a good plan to me. If I have time I would like to fix the editorial #203, but I don't see it as a major blocker. Rather than a CfC on Thursday (tomorrow), we can add it to the agenda and note it as a resolution with a review period as per the decision policy. Kind regards, Nigel On 28/02/2018, 04:20, "Pierre-Anthony Lemieux" <pal@sandflow.com> wrote: >Good morning/evening, > >I have prepared a CR branch at [1] for TTML1 3ED, and created a PR [2] >for the purposes of tracking comments against it. > >[1] https://github.com/w3c/ttml1/tree/TTML1-3ED-CR1 >[2] https://github.com/w3c/ttml1/pull/343 > >Two PRs [3] are outstanding, both editorial in nature. > >[3] >https://github.com/w3c/ttml1/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+milestone%3A%223rd+ >Ed+CR%22 > >Two issues (#311 and # 203) are shown as outstanding. I believe both >can/should be deferred. Both are editorial, and require a level of >effort and risk that does not seem entirely worth it at this point. > >Since there are no substantive issues remaining, I recommend the group >issue this Thursday a CfC to publish the TTML1 3ED CR in two weeks. > >Best, > >-- Pierre >
Received on Wednesday, 28 February 2018 16:19:04 UTC