- From: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 10:20:41 -0700
- To: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
- Cc: Timed Text Working Group <public-tt@w3.org>
Hi Nigel, Below are a couple of IMSCvNEXT-related topics: - FPWD of IMSCvNEXT - liaison to external organizations re: IMSCvNEXT - questions raised by Mike Dolan (https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2017Oct/0023.html) - deprecation of IMSC1 features such as smpte:backgoundImage - replacing references from TTML1 to TTML2 Best, -- Pierre On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> wrote: > This meeting is scheduled for up to 120m. Please be ready for a prompt start > at 10:03am Boston time. > > We have a lot to cover, including IMSCvNext requirements, TTML2 wide review > comments and WebVTT wide review comments so we are likely to use the whole 2 > hours. > > Our teleconference is scheduled with reference to Boston Time, the correct > time of this teleconference in your locale may change. > > Check > https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20171005T10&p1=43 > > Thursdays 10:03am-12:00pm Boston local > > Joining details: > > see https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-tt/2016Oct/0009.html > (members-only link – if you can't see this and wish to join please contact > me) > > Agenda+ Assign Roles > > Chairs: Nigel Megitt > > Scribe: usually Nigel – open to offers! > > Regrets: None > > Activity since last meeting: > See individual agenda items for recent activity on specific products > > Cross-product TTWG board: http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/board/ > > We are still using tracker for actions unrelated to issues. > Please do not add or modify issues in tracker! > > > IMSC: https://github.com/w3c/imsc/pulse > TTML1: https://github.com/w3c/ttml1/pulse > TTML2: https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/pulse > TTML Profile Registry: https://github.com/w3c/tt-profile-registry/pulse > TTML-WebVTT mapping: https://github.com/w3c/ttml-webvtt-mapping/pulse > > WebVTT: https://github.com/w3c/webvtt/pulse > > Agenda+ Prioritise discussion for this meeting and look ahead > > Check-point for order of topics – I'd suggest, subject to reordering: > 1. TPAC advanced planning > 2. TTML2 Wide & Horizontal Review > 3. IMSC including vNext requirements > 4. TTML issue assignment and progress tracking > 5. TTML1 & TTML2 issues, actions, PRs, editorial actions etc > 6. WebVTT feedback (David Singer to Chair if present) > 7. HDR in PNG (placeholder) > 8. Progress on HTMLCue proposal (placeholder) > 9. AOB – please notify of any other AOB now! > > > > Reminder re future milestones and meetings: > > October meetings: > > Thursday 12th October: TTWG phone meeting 2 Hour(s) > Thursday 19th October: TTWG phone meeting ? Hour(s) > Thursday 26th October: TTWG phone meeting ? Hour(s) > > IMSC 2 and TTML2 publication events: see the timeline of upcoming work at > https://www.w3.org/wiki/TimedText/Publications#Timeline_of_TTML2_and_IMSC2_work > > Further ahead: > > Thursday 2nd November TTWG phone meeting 2 Hours (finalise TPAC agenda) > Thursday 9th November: TTWG Face to Face meeting at TPAC > Friday 10th November: TTWG Face to Face meeting at TPAC > Thursday 16th November: TTWG phone meeting ? Hour(s) > Thursday 23rd November: TTWG phone meeting ? Hour(s) > Thursday 30th November: TTWG phone meeting ? Hour(s) > > Agenda+ TPAC 2017 Advanced planning > > Please be ready to discuss TPAC scheduling of agenda items > > W3C TPAC 2017 event page: https://www.w3.org/2017/11/TPAC/Overview.html > TTWG TPAC2017 wiki page: https://www.w3.org/wiki/TimedText/tpac2017 > > I have requested a Polycom phone and flipchart. > > We will jointly meet the Web & TV IG on the Monday, and have invited CSS WG > to attend our meeting on the Friday, times to be confirmed. > > Agenda+ TTML2 Wide and Horizontal Review > > All TTML2 Wide Review comments are now on the TTML2 GitHub repository with > links to the comment emails, and are labelled appropriately. Thank you > Thierry! > > ID State Title Person Due Date Associated with > ACTION-506 open Draft a wiki page explaining our review and disposition > steps and labels Thierry Michel 2017-09-21 > > Collate list of the issues we want to open with CSS WG > > Minutes from CSS WG Paris F2F that Nigel attended remotely on Friday 4th > August: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Sep/0000.html > This is at https://www.w3.org/wiki/TTML/CSSRequirements > The CSS WG has been invited to meet us at TPAC on the Friday. > We also need to explain what the use case is for the features, rather than > just each styling feature itself. > > TAG design review issue: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/138 > > CSS Review of TTML2, threads: FW: TTML2 horizontal review with CSS and Fwd: > Subtitle/caption styling + TTML + CSS > > Internationalisation review by r12a has generated several issues on TTML2 > and comments on existing issues (see below), this week mainly about > alignment with relatively recent CSS developments. > > CSS 2.2 request for reviews from TTWG et al: Pre-announcement of CR for CSS > 2.2 & request for reviews When can we schedule a review and gather feedback? > > > Agenda+ IMSC (now incorporates Unicode ticket) > > ID State Title Person Due Date Associated with > ACTION-507 open Add imsc vnext repo to agenda, board, github-bot etc Nigel > Megitt 2017-10-05 > > IMSC Tests released as v1.0.0 at > https://github.com/w3c/imsc-tests/releases/tag/v1.0.0 . > > IMSC 1.0.1 > IMSC 1.0.1 CR published at > https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/CR-ttml-imsc1.0.1-20170713/ > IMSC 1.0.1 Implementation report at > https://www.w3.org/wiki/TimedText/IMSC1_0_1_Implementation_Report > IMSC 1 Rec available at https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/REC-ttml-imsc1-20160421/ > Patent policy call for exclusions sent 2017-02-03, archived at > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2017Feb/0006.html > > Editor's draft is directly viewable at > http://w3c.github.io/imsc/imsc1/spec/ttml-ww-profiles.html > IMSC Implementation Page: > https://www.w3.org/wiki/TimedText/IMSC1_implementation_page. > IMSC Tests repository: https://github.com/w3c/imsc-tests > > vNext Requirements > > IMSCvNext Requirements editor's draft: > https://w3c.github.io/imsc-vnext-reqs/ > IMSCvNext Requirements repository: https://github.com/w3c/imsc-vnext-reqs > > Unicode CLDR discussion > Unicode ticket is at http://unicode.org/cldr/trac/ticket/8915 > Pierre's response to the recent update is at > http://unicode.org/cldr/trac/ticket/8915#comment:9 > Email response from Shervin at Unicode > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2016Dec/0018.html > > Merged IMSC pull requests: None > > Open IMSC pull requests: None > > New or discussed IMSC issues: None > > Closed IMSC issues: None > > Merged IMSC Tests pull requests: None > > Open IMSC Tests pull requests: None > > New or discussed IMSC Tests issues: None > > Closed IMSC Tests issues: None > > Merged IMSCvNext pull requests: None > > Open IMSCvNext pull requests: None > > New or discussed IMSCvNext issues: > > Is #textEmphasis necessary, or is #textEmphasis-minimal sufficient? > Is #ruby necessary, or #ruby-non-nested sufficient? > > Closed IMSCvNext issues: None > > Agenda+ TTML issue assignment and progress tracking (20 minutes maximum) > > We have now published the WD for WR however there are still many issues > open, and we intend also to apply multiple fixes as already agreed for > TTML1. > > At the moment of writing this agenda, there are: > > TTML1 issues: > > 3 open issues with no milestone, none marked as discussed and agreed > 37 open issues in "3rd Ed" milestone, 15 marked as discussed and agreed > 11 open issues in "3rd Ed Test Suite" milestone, none marked as discussed > and agreed > > TTML2 issues: > > 2 open issues on the Editor's CR Work List milestone, none of which has a PR > and both of which are horizontal review comments marked WR-pending; > 101 open issues with no milestone, none of which has a PR open label. > > > Agenda+ TTML1 & TTML2 issues, actions, PRs, editorial actions etc > > Actions: > ID State Title Person Due Date Associated with > ACTION-443 open Prepare a document showing mapping arib ruby extension > features to ttml2 for use as a liaison document to arib. Glenn Adams > 2016-08-26 TTML2 > ACTION-462 open Create issue on ttml2 to add "mapping from other versions > and profiles of ttml" Glenn Adams 2016-04-28 TTML2 > > Most recent WD published at https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/WD-ttml2-20170630/ > > Merged TTML1 Pull Requests: None > > Merged TTML2 Pull Requests: None > Open TTML1 Pull Requests: None > > Open TTML2 Pull Requests: None > New TTML1 Issues: None > > New TTML2 Issues: > > Definition of ttp:activeArea does not match ittp:activeArea defined in > IMSC1.0.1. > Definition of tts:fillLineGap does not match itts:fillLineGap as specified > in IMSC 1.0.1. > Feature #textOutline should be specified as a union of #textOutline-blurred > and #textOutline-unblurred. > Feature #writingMode should be specified as the union of > #writingMode-vertical and #writingMode-horizontal. > Content Profile Semantics (5.2.4.2) refers to > ttp:contentProfiles="any(...)". > Definition of [construct effective content profile] does not take into > account `ttp:profile` attribute value. > Specification of ttp:contentProfileCombination does not specify an > initial/default value. > Is ttp:version="2" required if ttp:contentProfiles is present? > Definition of [external data resource] does not include src attribute on > image element. > Change summary not up to date. > Duplicated text for attributes in TT Style Namespace. > Foreign namespace elements not reflected in syntax. > Condition attribute missing in Core catalog. > Clarify use of whitespace in style attribute values. > Make backward compatibility normative. > Support for roll-up and paint-on captions. > > Change styling to use CSS. > > [ttml2] TTML2 wide review comment: styling > > 3GPP review of TTML2 > > ITU-T Group 16 IPTV r review of TTML2 > > CTA r review of TTML2 > > DASH-IF review of TTML2 > > ISO JTC1/SC 29 review of TTML2 > > ARIB review of TTML2 > > SMPTE response as TTML2 review > > Closed TTML1 Issues: > > Unspecified font size can't fit a region extent if it's specified in pixels > > Closed TTML2 Issues: > > Review by APA WG. > > Discussed TTML1 Issues: None > Discussed TTML2 Issues: > > Privacy review umbrella issue > > > Focus topic(s) for this week > > Issues > > Iterate through open issues with no PR – decide action to take on each, e.g. > defer to CR, defer to TTML.next, close etc. > > If there are any issues that we decide need to be resolved before WR a > proposal for the fix is needed ASAP (basically, it's too late already unless > it can easily be agreed by the group). > > > Current open issues: https://github.com/w3c/ttml1/issues and > https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/issues > See spreadsheet of editorial actions at > https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/blob/master/spec/ednotes.xlsx > Edit/build instructions now in README in ttml2/spec/ at > https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/blob/master/spec/README.md > > > Agenda+ WebVTT review feedback > > ID State Title Person Due Date Associated with > ACTION-396 open Produce evidence of request for wide review for webvtt, for > the archive David Singer 2015-04-17 WebVTT 1.0 > ACTION-502 open Explain to david that we need a more consistent disposition > of comments for webvtt. Thierry Michel 2017-08-10 WebVTT 1.0 > > > Discussion on WebVTT review feedback and next steps. > > What are the WG's views on the dispositions generated by the CG? > > Resolve to publish a new WD? (not strictly necessary) > > WebVTT Wide review wiki page: https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebVTT_Wide_Review > > Open Pull requests: > > Fix #270: Add classes to specify text color > > Clarify the "WebVTT cue settings list" definition. > > Add a "User agents that do not support CSS" conformance class. > > Move definition of chapter title text > > Merged Pull requests: > > Update editor > Add Silvia as editor > > New issues: > > Wide Review Comment 2017: serialisation and parsing > Wide Review Comment 2017: Content signalling > Wide Review Comment 2017: Timing > Wide Review Comment 2017: Timestamp syntax > Wide Review Comment 2017: default font size and line heights > Wide Review Comment 2017: default background colour > Wide Review Comment 2017: future styling options mechanism > Wide Review Comment 2017: No style property list for ::cue-region > Wide Review Comment 2017: position and size reference is video or video > viewport? > Wide Review Comment 2017: positioning with cue box vs region > Wide Review Comment 2017: Positioning - are region height and width used? > Wide Review Comment 2017: Use of lines as positioning constructs > Wide Review Comment 2017: unspecified edge margins make accurate positioning > impossible > Wide Review Comment 2017: Metadata delimiters > Wide Review Comment 2017: hard to understand because of terminology > Wide Review Comment 2017: line cue setting direction > Wide Review Comment 2017: positioning model > Wide Review Comment 2017: Algorithmic specification > Wide Review Comment 2017: formatting issues > Change alt text for region diagram > > Closed issues: None > > Recently discussed issues: > > Wide Review Comment 2017: Text color must be mandatory > Wide Review Comment 2017: Chapter location for defining WebVTT chapter title > text > Need tests for :cue-region(id) pseudo-class > Wide Review Comment 2017: Conformance Classes not complete > Wide Review Comment 2017: Term "WebVTT cue settings list" defined twice > Wide Review Comment 2017: Term definition with empty content > Wide Review Comment 2017: Distinction between cue payload types > > > Agenda+ HDR in PNG [placeholder agenda item] > > We published this Note at https://www.w3.org/TR/png-hdr-pq/ (republished > 25th July incorporating fix for typo) > > Repo for PQ HDR in PNG: https://github.com/w3c/png-hdr-pq > Draft WG Note: https://w3c.github.io/png-hdr-pq/ > > Merged pull requests: None > > Open pull requests: None > > New or discussed issues: None > > Closed issues: None > > Agenda+ HTMLCue proposal progress update. [placeholder agenda item] > > > ID State Title Person Due Date Associated with > ACTION-441 open Kick off the analysis work on the vttcue carrying html idea. > Andreas Tai 2015-11-05 > > See https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2016Apr/0012.html for > further information on this, this week. > > Also HTML import and HTMLCue? email from 2016-09-06. > > See also the notes from the TAG meeting (see agenda item above) at which the > inability to instantiate TextTrackCue objects in most browsers was > mentioned. > > > > Agenda+ AOB > > References > > Wiki http://www.w3.org/wiki/TimedText > > > > ---------------------------- > > http://www.bbc.co.uk > This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal > views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. > If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. > Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance > on it and notify the sender immediately. > Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. > Further communication will signify your consent to this. > > ---------------------
Received on Tuesday, 3 October 2017 17:21:35 UTC