- From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 17:43:37 +0200
- To: Xueyuan <xueyuan@w3.org>
- Cc: Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org>, plh@w3.org, W3C Comm Team <w3t-comm@w3.org>, W3C Public TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
Le 12/07/2017 à 16:14, Xueyuan a écrit : > > Hi Thierry, > > On 12/07/2017 18:41, Thierry MICHEL wrote: >> Xueyuan >> >> Sure, I had drafted ACs announcement a few days ago and got it >> validated by PLH. > Thank you for your quick response and the draft. Wrt comment on this > document, is there somewhere people can learn about issues raised during > the CR review period (e.g., a link to an GitHub issues list)? https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/issues and W3C Public TTWG <public-tt@w3.org> >> >> For the home page news use the following: > Got it. Thank you! > > Best Regards, > Xueyuan >> >> This document specifies two profiles of [TTML1]: a text-only profile >> and an image-only profile. These profiles are intended to be used >> across subtitle and caption delivery applications worldwide, thereby >> simplifying interoperability, consistent rendering and conversion to >> other subtitling and captioning formats. >> This revision of the IMSC1 adds two new features (ittp:activeArea and >> itts:fillLineGap) to the Recommendation dated 21 April 2016 >> >> >> Best, >> thierry >> ________________________________________________________ >> >> >> Dear Advisory Committee Representative, >> Chairs, >> >> I am pleased to announce that IMSC1.0.1 is a W3C Candidate >> Recommendation: >> >> * Title: TTML Profiles for Internet Media Subtitles and Captions 1.0.1 >> (IMSC1) >> >> * URI: https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/CR-ttml-imsc1.0.1-20170713/ >> >> The approval and publication are in response to this transition request: >> >> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2017AprJun/0154.html >> >> Comments regarding this document are welcome. Please send them by >> 2017-08-13 to public-tt@w3.org with [imsc] at the start of your >> email's subject. >> >> This Candidate Recommendation is expected to advance to Proposed >> Recommendation no earlier than 13 August 2017. >> >> This publication is the result of a revision of the IMSC1 >> Recommendation dated 21 April 2016, adding two new features (6.7.5 >> ittp:activeArea and 6.7.6 itts:fillLineGap features). >> This document is designed such that Processors and document instances >> that conform to the Recommendation dated 21 April 2016 also conform to >> this revision. >> >> There were no Formal Objections. >> >> Patent disclosures relevant to this specification may be found on the >> Timed Text Working Group's patent disclosure page in conformance with >> W3C policy: >> https://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/34314/status >> >> As the Advisory Committee review begins at the same time as Candidate >> Recommendation, you may start to review the specification and indicate >> whether you endorse it as a W3C Recommendation or object to its >> advancement by completing the following questionnaire: >> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/IMSC101/ >> >> The review will end no less than 4 weeks after publication as a >> Proposed Recommendation. Additional details about the review are >> available in the questionnaire. >> >> This Call for Implementations and Review follow section 6.4 "Candidate >> Recommendation" of the W3C Process Document: >> https://www.w3.org/2017/Process-20170301/#candidate-rec >> >> Thank you, >> >> For Tim Berners-Lee, Director, and >> Philippe Le Hégaret, Project Management Lead; >> Xueyuan Jia, W3C Marketing & Communications >> >> ============================================== >> Quoting from >> TTML Profiles for Internet Media Subtitles and Captions 1.0.1 (IMSC1) >> W3C Candidate Recommendation 13 July 2017 >> >> This Version: >> https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/CR-ttml-imsc1.0.1-20170713/ >> Latest Published Version: >> https://www.w3.org/TR/ttml-imsc1.0.1/ >> >> >> Abstract: >> >> This document specifies two profiles of [TTML1]: a text-only profile >> and an image-only profile. These profiles are intended to be used >> across subtitle and caption delivery applications worldwide, thereby >> simplifying interoperability, consistent rendering and conversion to >> other subtitling and captioning formats. >> >> It is feasible to create documents that simultaneously conform to both >> [ttml10-sdp-us] and the text-only profile. >> >> The document defines extensions to [TTML1], as well as incorporates >> extensions specified in [ST2052-1] and [ EBU-TT-D]. >> >> Both profiles are based on [SUBM]. >> >> >> Status of This Document: >> >> This section describes the status of this document at the time of its >> publication. Other documents may supersede this document. A list of >> current W3C publications and the latest revision of this technical >> report can be found in the W3C technical reports index at >> https://www.w3.org/TR/. >> >> This document was published by the Timed Text Working Group as a >> Candidate Recommendation. This document is intended to become a W3C >> Recommendation. Comments regarding this document are welcome. Please >> send them to public-tt@w3.org (subscribe, archives) with [imsc] at the >> start of your email's subject. W3C publishes a Candidate >> Recommendation to indicate that the document is believed to be stable >> and to encourage implementation by the developer community. This >> Candidate Recommendation is expected to advance to Proposed >> Recommendation no earlier than 13 August 2017. >> >> Please see the Working Group's implementation report. >> >> For this specification to exit the CR stage, at least 2 independent >> implementations of every feature defined in this specification but not >> already present in [IMSC1] need to be documented in the implementation >> report. The implementation report is based on implementer-provided >> test results for the exit criteria test suite. The Working Group does >> not require that implementations are publicly available but encourages >> them to be so. >> The Working Group has not identified features "at risk" for this >> specification. >> >> A list of the substantive changes applied since the initial Working >> Draft is found at substantive-changes-summary.txt. >> >> This revision of the document is designed such that Processors and >> document instances that conform to the Recommendation dated 21 April >> 2016 also conform to this revision. As a result, review should focus >> on the modifications made since the Recommendation dated 21 April >> 2016, including the 6.7.5 ittp:activeArea and 6.7.6 itts:fillLineGap >> features. >> >> For convenience, a complete diff between this version and the >> Recommendation dated 21 April 2016 is found at diff.html. >> >> Publication as a Candidate Recommendation does not imply endorsement >> by the W3C Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated, >> replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is >> inappropriate to cite this document as other than work in progress. >> >> This document was produced by a group operating under the 5 February >> 2004 W3C Patent Policy. W3C maintains a public list of any patent >> disclosures made in connection with the deliverables of the group; >> that page also includes instructions for disclosing a patent. An >> individual who has actual knowledge of a patent which the individual >> believes contains Essential Claim(s) must disclose the information in >> accordance with section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy. >> >> This document is governed by the 1 March 2017 W3C Process Document. >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Thierry >> >> Le 12/07/2017 à 11:56, Xueyuan a écrit : >>> >>> Hi Thierry, >>> >>> Could you please provide a draft announcement (including an AC review >>> form) for the IMSC1 CR publication? >>> >>> We also do Homepage news for CR publication. Please recommend a Homepage >>> news draft, or we could post the default news generated based on the >>> document's abstract. >>> >>> Regarding to the announcement to members, please see below for some >>> reference info that you might need: >>> >>> Transition announcement should include the following info: >>> https://www.w3.org/Guide/transitions?profile=CR&cr=new#trans-annc >>> >>> Template to easily generate the draft: >>> https://www.w3.org/new-doc-from-template?location=%2FTeam%2F&template=%2Fafs%2Fw3.org%2Fpub%2FWWW%2FTeam%2FTemplates%2Fcfi.html&submit=Continue... >>> >>> >>> >>> Some samples at: >>> https://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Member/search?keywords=&hdr-1-name=subject&hdr-1-query=candidate+recommendation&index-grp=Member__FULL+Public__FULL&index-type=t&type-index=w3c-ac-members >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Xueyuan >>> >>> >>> On 08/07/2017 03:23, Ralph Swick wrote: >>>> I have reviewed this transition request. On behalf of the Director I >>>> approve TTML Profiles for Internet Media Subtitles and Captions 1.0.1 >>>> (IMSC1) as a Candidate Recommendation. >>>> >>>> -Ralph >>>> >>>> On 6/30/2017 10:18 AM, Thierry MICHEL wrote: >>>>> Dear Director, PlH, >>>>> >>>>> This is a Transition Request from the Timed Text WG for publication >>>>> of a Candidate Recommendation of the "TTML Profiles for Internet >>>>> Media Subtitles and Captions 1.0.1 (IMSC1)". >>>>> >>>>> Transition details below. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 1. Boilerplate ... >>>>> >>>>> * Document title: TTML Profiles for Internet Media Subtitles and >>>>> Captions 1.0.1 (IMSC1) >>>>> >>>>> * Document URI: >>>>> https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/CR-ttml-imsc1.0.1-20170706/ >>>>> >>>>> Latest published version: >>>>> https://www.w3.org/TR/ttml-imsc1.0.1/ >>>>> >>>>> * Estimated publication date: 06 July 2017 >>>>> >>>>> * Abstract: >>>>> This document specifies two profiles of [TTML1]: a text-only profile >>>>> and an image-only profile. These profiles are intended to be used >>>>> across subtitle and caption delivery applications worldwide, thereby >>>>> simplifying interoperability, consistent rendering and conversion to >>>>> other subtitling and captioning formats. >>>>> It is feasible to create documents that simultaneously conform to >>>>> both [ttml10-sdp-us] and the text-only profile. >>>>> The document defines extensions to [TTML1], as well as incorporates >>>>> extensions specified in [ST2052-1] and [ EBU-TT-D]. >>>>> Both profiles are based on [SUBM]. >>>>> >>>>> * SotD: >>>>> >>>>> This document was published by the Timed Text Working Group as a >>>>> Candidate Recommendation. This document is intended to become a W3C >>>>> Recommendation. Comments regarding this document are welcome. Please >>>>> send them to public-tt@w3.org (subscribe, archives) with [imsc] at >>>>> the start of your email's subject. W3C publishes a Candidate >>>>> Recommendation to indicate that the document is believed to be stable >>>>> and to encourage implementation by the developer community. This >>>>> Candidate Recommendation is expected to advance to Proposed >>>>> Recommendation no earlier than 06 August 2017. >>>>> >>>>> Please see the Working Group's implementation report. >>>>> >>>>> For this specification to exit the CR stage, at least 2 independent >>>>> implementations of every feature defined in this specification but >>>>> not already present in [IMSC1] need to be documented in the >>>>> implementation report. The implementation report is based on >>>>> implementer-provided test results for the exit criteria test suite. >>>>> The Working Group does not require that implementations are publicly >>>>> available but encourages them to be so. >>>>> The Working Group has not identified features "at risk" for this >>>>> specification. >>>>> >>>>> A list of the substantive changes applied since the initial Working >>>>> Draft is found at substantive-changes-summary.txt. >>>>> >>>>> This revision of the document is designed such that Processors and >>>>> document instances that conform to the Recommendation dated 21 April >>>>> 2016 also conform to this revision. As a result, review should focus >>>>> on the modifications made since the Recommendation dated 21 April >>>>> 2016, including the 6.7.5 ittp:activeArea and 6.7.6 itts:fillLineGap >>>>> features. >>>>> >>>>> For convenience, a complete diff between this version and the >>>>> Recommendation dated 21 April 2016 is found at diff.html. >>>>> >>>>> Publication as a Candidate Recommendation does not imply endorsement >>>>> by the W3C Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated, >>>>> replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is >>>>> inappropriate to cite this document as other than work in progress. >>>>> >>>>> This document was produced by a group operating under the 5 February >>>>> 2004 W3C Patent Policy. W3C maintains a public list of any patent >>>>> disclosures made in connection with the deliverables of the group; >>>>> that page also includes instructions for disclosing a patent. An >>>>> individual who has actual knowledge of a patent which the individual >>>>> believes contains Essential Claim(s) must disclose the information in >>>>> accordance with section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy. >>>>> >>>>> This document is governed by the 1 March 2017 W3C Process Document. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2. Record of the WG's Decision to request the CR Transition: >>>>> >>>>> The decision to advance this spec to CR is recorded in the following >>>>> meeting minutes: >>>>> [From the Minutes]: >>>>> RESOLUTION: Publish IMSC 1.0.1 based on the current ED with request >>>>> for review by August 6 assuming there are no changes due to comments >>>>> by ARIB tomorrow and the differences issue is resolved. >>>>> See >>>>> https://www.w3.org/2017/06/29-tt-minutes.html >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Note: The "differences issue" shown in the resolution >>>>> text quoted above is in fact resolved by generating the resource >>>>> referenced by 3. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 3. Report of Important Changes to the Document since the 30 September >>>>> 2014 >>>>> >>>>> A list of the substantive changes (only very few substantive changes) >>>>> applied since the First Public Working Draft (02 February 2017) is >>>>> available at >>>>> >>>>> https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/CR-ttml-imsc1.0.1-20170706/substantive-changes-summary.txt >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 4. Evidence that the document satisfies Group's Requirements: >>>>> >>>>> No requirements were defined for this specification in the Timed Text >>>>> Working Group's charter at >>>>> https://www.w3.org/2016/05/timed-text-charter.html >>>>> >>>>> 5. Evidence Dependencies With Other Groups Met: >>>>> >>>>> The specification has the following normative references: >>>>> https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/CR-ttml-imsc1.0.1-20170706/#normative-references >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> IMSC 1.0.1 includes 4 normative references to W3C specifications. All >>>>> are W3C Recommendations. >>>>> >>>>> Dependencies with other groups have been explored and ensuing issues >>>>> resolved during the previous WD version and during the wide review WD >>>>> publication. >>>>> >>>>> Additionally, the Timed Text Working Group chairs and team contacts >>>>> are >>>>> confident that they do not have any dependencies with other working >>>>> groups that have not been satisfied. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 6. Evidence that the document has received Wide Review: >>>>> >>>>> This document is governed by the 1 March 2017 W3C Process Document. >>>>> Therefore no Last Call WD was published but the last WD publication >>>>> (22 March 2017) triggered a call for review with the same >>>>> requirements as a Last Call WD. >>>>> >>>>> This version of IMSC1 makes editorial corrections and adds two >>>>> optional features (6.7.5 ittp:activeArea and 6.7.6 itts:fillLineGap) >>>>> over the Recommendation dated 21 April 2016. Processors and document >>>>> instances that conform to the Recommendation dated 21 April 2016 also >>>>> conform to this version of the specification. >>>>> >>>>> The specification has been widely reviewed both by public commenters, >>>>> by other W3C working groups and by key participants involved in work >>>>> at other organizations. >>>>> >>>>> The Timed Text Working Group requested review from WGs those listed >>>>> for >>>>> coordination in the TTWG Charter. The chairs of the working group >>>>> listed have been copied on the distribution list of this transition >>>>> announcement as well as other individuals known to have expressed >>>>> prior interest. >>>>> >>>>> * Dependencies with W3C Groups (Listed in the TTWG charter) >>>>> - Web Platform Working Group >>>>> - Accessible Platform Architectures (APA) Working Group >>>>> - CSS Working Group >>>>> >>>>> * Liaisons with W3C Groups: (Listed in the TTWG charter) >>>>> - Web and TV Interest Group >>>>> - Web Media Text Tracks Community Group >>>>> - Internationalization (i18n) Working Group >>>>> >>>>> * Additional W3C Groups: (Not listed in the TTWG charter) >>>>> - Privacy Interest Group >>>>> - Web Security Interest Group >>>>> - TAG / Self-Review Questionnaire >>>>> >>>>> * External Groups >>>>> >>>>> - ISO/IEC JTC-1/SC-29 WG 11 Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG) >>>>> - Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) >>>>> - European Broadcasting Union (EBU) >>>>> - Digital Entertainment Content Ecosystem (DECE) >>>>> - DVB Project: Technical Module (DVB-TM) >>>>> - Advanced Television Systems Committee (ATSC) >>>>> - Association of Radio Industries and Businesses (ARIB) >>>>> >>>>> * Additional External Groups (Not listed in the TTWG charter) >>>>> >>>>> - TTA >>>>> - ITU-T Group 16 IPTV >>>>> - IPTV Forum Japan >>>>> - HbbTV >>>>> - ETSI MCD >>>>> - DLNA >>>>> - DTG >>>>> - DASH-IF >>>>> - CTA >>>>> - 3GPP >>>>> >>>>> 7. Evidence that Issues Have Been Formally Addressed: >>>>> >>>>> During the wide review period, 13 comments were raised. >>>>> >>>>> - 13 comments were processed by the TTWG. Proposals were either >>>>> approved by commenter or didn't received any feedback to the TTWG >>>>> response. >>>>> >>>>> Comments, Messages responding to individual commenters and responses >>>>> from commenters are available in the >>>>> Disposition of comments for the Timed Text Working Group >>>>> https://www.w3.org/wiki/IMSC1.0.1_Comments_tracker >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 8. Objections: >>>>> >>>>> There are no Formal Objection from a TTWG Member or other parties, >>>>> during the preparation of this specification. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 9. Features marked as "at risk": >>>>> >>>>> The Working Group has not identified features "at risk" for this >>>>> specification. >>>>> >>>>> 10. Implementation Information: >>>>> >>>>> CR exit criteria from the SoTD section: >>>>> >>>>> "For this specification to exit the CR stage, at least 2 independent >>>>> implementations of every feature defined in this specification but >>>>> not already present in [IMSC1] need to be documented in the >>>>> implementation report. The implementation report is based on >>>>> implementer-provided test results for the exit criteria test suite. >>>>> The Working Group does not require that implementations are publicly >>>>> available but encourages them to be so." >>>>> >>>>> A first draft of the IMSC1.0.1 implementation report is available at >>>>> https://www.w3.org/wiki/TimedText/IMSC1_0_1_Implementation_Report >>>>> >>>>> CR Test Suite: >>>>> A preliminary testsuite (a repository of subtitle documents >>>>> conforming to IMSC 1.0.1) is available, but we expect it to evolve >>>>> significantly during the CR stage. >>>>> >>>>> https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/CR-ttml-imsc1.0.1-20170706/exit-criteria-tests/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The new features have been already deployed in one implementation. >>>>> >>>>> The TTWG will collect additional implementation experience that will >>>>> help demonstrate interoperability according to the CR exit criteria. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 11. Patent Disclosures: none >>>>> https://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/34314/status >>>>> >>>>> This document is governed by the 1 March 2017 W3C Process Document. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Nigel Megitt, Chair of the Timed Text Working Group. >>>>> Thierry Michel, Team Contact for the Timed Text Working Group. >>>> >>> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 12 July 2017 15:44:03 UTC