- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 22:34:21 +1000
- To: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Cc: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>, Andreas Tai <tai@irt.de>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, Benjamin Schaaf <ben.schaaf@gmail.com>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, W3C Public TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
David, On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 3:20 AM, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote: > David, > > see my responses in line. > > >>> Le 02/08/2017 à 01:15, David Singer a écrit : >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Thierry >>>> >>>> I think the TT group has now had a month to complain or comment on the >>>> disposition, so I think we can/should take them as OK. See >>>> <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2017Jun/0109.html> >>>> >>>> We have a new WD, thank you. I think we should formally re-request Wide >>>> Review with the hope of a CR transition soon. > > > I have edited a new WD for the wide review ending sept 22nd. > https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/WD-webvtt1-20170808/ > > I will prepare the wide review request message and send you a draft. > > > The previous Wide Review is >>>> >>>> extensively documented <https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebVTT_Wide_Review> as >>>> you >>>> know. > > > > This documents looks a bit like a disposition of comments for the first wide > review in 2014. It is edited in a wiki (there is no formal document required > for this by the W3C process). > > All comments seems to have been processed. > > - One is resolved but probably not incorporated "2.3- Done - CG resolution". > > - Some are resolved and incorporated into the specs (marked as "2.4- Done - > CG resolution and spec update"). > > > - Some are resolved but rejected : "2.7- Done but comment Rejected" > > > In all cases, did the commenters agreed to these CG resolutions? > > If yes, could you provide links to approuval message? > > If no, we must go through a regular process to contact commenters and get > their approuval, and the TTWG could then change the status to the following. I've started adding links to the wiki https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebVTT_Wide_Review to the approvals by the commenters and moved those bugs to status 3.4. I've only done I18N this far and have requested feedback from Richard and Addison where there was no explicit approval from them on the discussions. We still need to do this for the other bugs. Cheers, Silvia. > > 3.1- CG resolution approuved by WG > 3.2- Approuved and Response drafted > 3.3- Response send to commenter > 3.4- Response agreed by commenter > 3.5- Response rejected by commenter (need more discussion - back to step > 2.5) > 3.6- Response partially agreed by commenter (need more discussion - back to > step 2.5) > > Thierry
Received on Wednesday, 9 August 2017 12:35:06 UTC