- From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 09:39:00 +0200
- To: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>, "www-international@w3.org" <www-international@w3.org>
- Cc: W3C Public TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
Le 21/09/2016 à 15:30, Phillips, Addison a écrit : > Thanks Thierry. > >> Once our final TTML2 WD is published in TR, we will let you know to start the >> review (should happen end of oct). > > Thanks. Are there sections that are stable/unstable? AS it should be our final WD, all sections should be stable. Are there areas of particular concern for review? Yes, only the new features introduced in TTML2. TTML is a large spec. We'd like to start early. >> >> Then we would like to go to CR before end of the year (that also depends on >> the amount of comments we get during the review). > > I will note that 1 November to the end of the year does not leave a lot of time for review and any subsequent issue resolution because of the holiday season and given the size and complexity of the spec in question. I recall that the review of TTML 1.0 took a while. That s why focussing only n the new TTML2 features should reduced the size of the spec to review. We'll do our best. Thanks for doing your best to meet our milestones. Thierry > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org] >> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 2:03 PM >> To: Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com>; www-international@w3.org >> Cc: W3C Public TTWG <public-tt@w3.org> >> Subject: Re: TTML2 horizontal review with I18N. >> >> >> >> Le 21/09/2016 à 12:53, Phillips, Addison a écrit : >>> Hello Thierry and TT, >>> >>> Thanks for the advance notice. We look forward to providing a review. I >> have added your spec to our tracker [0]. >> >> Thank you >>> >>> As preparation for a review, can you add an 'i18n' label to your github issues. >> See instructions here [1]. This helps with auto-notification and tracking. >> >> Will look into it. >>> >>> I'm not completely clear on the timing you're requesting. Do you expect us >> to review after the 1 November draft? Or are you looking for a review prior >> to 1 November? Assuming the former, what is your goal for a CR transition >> date (so that we schedule our review in a timely manner)? >> >> Once our final TTML2 WD is published in TR, we will let you know to start the >> review (should happen end of oct). >> >> Then we would like to go to CR before end of the year (that also depends on >> the amount of comments we get during the review). >> >> Best, >> >> Thierry >> >>> Regards (for I18N), >>> >>> Addison >>> >>> Addison Phillips >>> Principal SDE, I18N Architect (Amazon) Chair (W3C I18N WG) >>> >>> Internationalization is not a feature. >>> It is an architecture. >>> >>> --- >>> [0] http://w3c.github.io/i18n-activity/radar/ >>> [1] https://www.w3.org/International/review-request#labels >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org] >>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 11:17 AM >>>> To: www-international@w3.org >>>> Cc: W3C Public TTWG <public-tt@w3.org> >>>> Subject: TTML2 horizontal review with I18N. >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> The Timed Text WG (TTWG) should publish by Nov 1st 2016 a last >>>> Working Draft of Timed Text Markup Language 2 (TTML2) before >>>> requesting CR publication. >>>> In order to do so, we need to fullfill an horizontal review with I18N >>>> and other groups. >>>> >>>> We plan to request this review from I18N early November. We hope this >>>> can meet your agenda. Please let us know. >>>> >>>> >>>> The horizontal review should focus only on the new features >>>> introduced in TTML2. >>>> >>>> FYI, our current TTML2 Draft is available at >>>> https://www.w3.org/TR/ttml2/ >>>> >>>> and editor's draft >>>> https://w3c.github.io/ttml2/spec/ttml2.html >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Thierry MICHEL >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>
Received on Thursday, 22 September 2016 07:39:27 UTC