- From: Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 13:30:34 +0000
- To: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>, "www-international@w3.org" <www-international@w3.org>
- CC: W3C Public TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
Thanks Thierry. > Once our final TTML2 WD is published in TR, we will let you know to start the > review (should happen end of oct). Thanks. Are there sections that are stable/unstable? Are there areas of particular concern for review? TTML is a large spec. We'd like to start early. > > Then we would like to go to CR before end of the year (that also depends on > the amount of comments we get during the review). I will note that 1 November to the end of the year does not leave a lot of time for review and any subsequent issue resolution because of the holiday season and given the size and complexity of the spec in question. I recall that the review of TTML 1.0 took a while. We'll do our best. Thanks, Addison > -----Original Message----- > From: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org] > Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 2:03 PM > To: Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com>; www-international@w3.org > Cc: W3C Public TTWG <public-tt@w3.org> > Subject: Re: TTML2 horizontal review with I18N. > > > > Le 21/09/2016 à 12:53, Phillips, Addison a écrit : > > Hello Thierry and TT, > > > > Thanks for the advance notice. We look forward to providing a review. I > have added your spec to our tracker [0]. > > Thank you > > > > As preparation for a review, can you add an 'i18n' label to your github issues. > See instructions here [1]. This helps with auto-notification and tracking. > > Will look into it. > > > > I'm not completely clear on the timing you're requesting. Do you expect us > to review after the 1 November draft? Or are you looking for a review prior > to 1 November? Assuming the former, what is your goal for a CR transition > date (so that we schedule our review in a timely manner)? > > Once our final TTML2 WD is published in TR, we will let you know to start the > review (should happen end of oct). > > Then we would like to go to CR before end of the year (that also depends on > the amount of comments we get during the review). > > Best, > > Thierry > > > Regards (for I18N), > > > > Addison > > > > Addison Phillips > > Principal SDE, I18N Architect (Amazon) Chair (W3C I18N WG) > > > > Internationalization is not a feature. > > It is an architecture. > > > > --- > > [0] http://w3c.github.io/i18n-activity/radar/ > > [1] https://www.w3.org/International/review-request#labels > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org] > >> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 11:17 AM > >> To: www-international@w3.org > >> Cc: W3C Public TTWG <public-tt@w3.org> > >> Subject: TTML2 horizontal review with I18N. > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> The Timed Text WG (TTWG) should publish by Nov 1st 2016 a last > >> Working Draft of Timed Text Markup Language 2 (TTML2) before > >> requesting CR publication. > >> In order to do so, we need to fullfill an horizontal review with I18N > >> and other groups. > >> > >> We plan to request this review from I18N early November. We hope this > >> can meet your agenda. Please let us know. > >> > >> > >> The horizontal review should focus only on the new features > >> introduced in TTML2. > >> > >> FYI, our current TTML2 Draft is available at > >> https://www.w3.org/TR/ttml2/ > >> > >> and editor's draft > >> https://w3c.github.io/ttml2/spec/ttml2.html > >> > >> Best, > >> > >> Thierry MICHEL > >> > >> > >> > >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 21 September 2016 13:31:05 UTC