W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > September 2016

RE: TTML2 horizontal review with I18N.

From: Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 13:30:34 +0000
To: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>, "www-international@w3.org" <www-international@w3.org>
CC: W3C Public TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
Message-ID: <01d42229ba7a46f2806c4c3966e40760@EX13D08UWB002.ant.amazon.com>
Thanks Thierry.

> Once our final TTML2 WD is published in TR, we will let you know to start the
> review (should happen end of oct).

Thanks. Are there sections that are stable/unstable? Are there areas of particular concern for review? TTML is a large spec. We'd like to start early.
> 
> Then we would like to go to CR before end of the year (that also depends on
> the amount of comments we get during the review).

I will note that 1 November to the end of the year does not leave a lot of time for review and any subsequent issue resolution because of the holiday season and given the size and complexity of the spec in question. I recall that the review of TTML 1.0 took a while. We'll do our best.

Thanks,

Addison

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 2:03 PM
> To: Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com>; www-international@w3.org
> Cc: W3C Public TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: TTML2 horizontal review with I18N.
> 
> 
> 
> Le 21/09/2016 à 12:53, Phillips, Addison a écrit :
> > Hello Thierry and TT,
> >
> > Thanks for the advance notice. We look forward to providing a review. I
> have added your spec to our tracker [0].
> 
> Thank you
> >
> > As preparation for a review, can you add an 'i18n' label to your github issues.
> See instructions here [1]. This helps with auto-notification and tracking.
> 
> Will look into it.
> >
> > I'm not completely clear on the timing you're requesting. Do you expect us
> to review after the 1 November draft? Or are you looking for a review prior
> to 1 November? Assuming the former, what is your goal for a CR transition
> date (so that we schedule our review in a timely manner)?
> 
> Once our final TTML2 WD is published in TR, we will let you know to start the
> review (should happen end of oct).
> 
> Then we would like to go to CR before end of the year (that also depends on
> the amount of comments we get during the review).
> 
> Best,
> 
> Thierry
> 
> > Regards (for I18N),
> >
> > Addison
> >
> > Addison Phillips
> > Principal SDE, I18N Architect (Amazon) Chair (W3C I18N WG)
> >
> > Internationalization is not a feature.
> > It is an architecture.
> >
> > ---
> > [0] http://w3c.github.io/i18n-activity/radar/

> > [1] https://www.w3.org/International/review-request#labels

> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 11:17 AM
> >> To: www-international@w3.org
> >> Cc: W3C Public TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
> >> Subject: TTML2 horizontal review with I18N.
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> The Timed Text WG (TTWG) should publish by Nov 1st 2016 a last
> >> Working Draft of Timed Text Markup Language 2 (TTML2) before
> >> requesting CR publication.
> >> In order to do so, we need to fullfill an horizontal review with I18N
> >> and other groups.
> >>
> >> We plan to request this review from I18N early November. We hope this
> >> can meet your agenda. Please let us know.
> >>
> >>
> >> The horizontal review should focus only on the new features
> >> introduced in TTML2.
> >>
> >> FYI, our current TTML2 Draft is available at
> >> https://www.w3.org/TR/ttml2/

> >>
> >> and editor's draft
> >> https://w3c.github.io/ttml2/spec/ttml2.html

> >>
> >> Best,
> >>
> >> Thierry MICHEL
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
Received on Wednesday, 21 September 2016 13:31:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:44:01 UTC