- From: Andreas Tai <tai@irt.de>
- Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 13:38:44 +0200
- To: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>, Timed Text Working Group <public-tt@w3.org>
- Cc: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
Hi Nigel, Thanks a lot for forwarding this. This activity is indeed very interesting. It seems to be an alternative to iframes. I am not sure if this would influence somehow the HTMLCue proposal though. I "cc" Simon Pieters who explained at the last TPAC meeting the security concerns of Web Standard Developers with an HTML Cue. For TPAC I suggest that we may prepare more details of this two options: 1) One that investigates how the current cue concept could be used already to solve our use case (possibly with few further properties). 2) Another that investigates to have a HTMLCue as specialisation of the general cue. My task was to investigate option 1) and I will report on this at TPAC. As discussed in the latest meeting we may check if we should have joint meeting with the Web Platform Group about this topic and we may also bring this up in the Web & TV interest group. Best regards, Andreas Am 06.09.2016 um 18:50 schrieb Nigel Megitt: > All, > > I see from the draft charter of the Web Platform Working Group > (https://www.w3.org/2016/08/web-platform-charter-draft.html) that they > have a potential deliverable to define HTML imports, where HTML is > reused in another document via the HTML Imports spec (editor's draft: > http://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/spec/imports/ ). > > This seems potentially related to the HTMLCue proposal in the sense > that an HTMLCue could cause an import link to be loaded. I see nothing > in the current editor's draft about unloading an HTML link however. > > Just raising for visibility, in case it triggers any other > constructive thoughts. > > Nigel >
Received on Thursday, 8 September 2016 11:52:14 UTC