- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 12:36:02 +0200
- To: "David Singer" <singer@apple.com>, "Thierry MICHEL" <tmichel@w3.org>
- Cc: "W3C Public TTWG" <public-tt@w3.org>
On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 09:55:50 +0200, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote: > Simon, David, > > Looking at WebVTT Draft Community Group Report, 15 July 2016 > https://w3c.github.io/webvtt/ > > I see a normative reference to > [WHATWG-DOM] > Anne van Kesteren. DOM Standard. Living Standard. URL: > https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/ > > This normative reference could be a problem. > > could'nt you use instead W3C DOM4 > W3C Recommendation 19 November 2015 > http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/REC-dom-20151119/ > > > Thierry The TR versions could do that if referencing WHATWG specs is a problem. For the CG report I would like to reference the upstream, most up-to-date version of a given spec, rather than a stable but out-of-date spec that has issues that have been fixed in the upstream version. -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Tuesday, 18 October 2016 10:36:38 UTC