- From: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 12:27:14 -0800
- To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Cc: Dae Kim <dakim@netflix.com>, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>, TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
Hi Glenn, Ok. What approach does XSL-FO and/or CSS take to allowing authors to avoid having to explicitly set a property through the document? Thanks, -- Pierre On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: > Because that is not how the semantics of styles in XSL-FO or CSS work, and > thus not how the semantics work in TTML (of any flavor). > > Specifying a non-inheritable property on an element to which that property > does not apply is a NO-OP. > > In TTML1 we have the following (Section 8.2): > > Note: > > Due to the general syntax of this specification (and the schemas it > references) with respect to how style attributes are specified, particularly > for the purpose of supporting inheritance, it is possible for an author to > inadvertently specify a non-inheritable style attribute on an element that > applies neither to that element or any of its descendants while still > remaining conformant from a content validity perspective. Content authors > may wish to make use of TTML content verification tools that detect and warn > about such usage. > > In TTML2 we promoted this to normative language (Section 10.2): > > Unless explicitly permitted by an element type definition, an attribute in > the TT Style Namespace should not be specified on an element unless it > either applies to that element or denotes an inheritable style property. If > it does not apply to that element and does not denote an inheritable style > property, then it must be ignored for the purpose of non-validation > processing. In the case of validation processing, such usage should be > reported as a warning, or, if strict validation is performed, as an error. > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi Glenn, >> >> > tts:backgroundColor >> >> Can you remind us why specifying tts:backgroundColor="X" on <tt> could >> not mean "set initial value of tts:backgroundColor to X"? >> >> Best, >> >> -- Pierre >> >> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux >> > <pal@sandflow.com> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Glenn et al., >> >> >> >> >Perhaps we need to review >> >> > uninheritable properties in TTML2 to determine if we need to upgrade >> >> > them to >> >> > inheritable, >> >> >> >> I like the idea of having a single mechanism for setting an initial >> >> value for properties, i.e. avoid having to set a property explicitly >> >> throughout the document. >> >> >> >> Expanding inheritance (instead of introducing a new <initial> element) >> >> seems promising, and intuitive. >> > >> > >> > That won't be sufficient, since we will not be able to make everything >> > inherit. The reason for this is related to the semantics of specific >> > style >> > properties. For example, the following cannot inherit: >> > >> > tts:backgroundColor >> > tts:backgroundImage >> > tts:backgroundPosition >> > tts:backgroundRepeat >> > tts:border >> > tts:bpd >> > tts:display >> > tts:extent >> > tts:ipd >> > tts:opacity >> > tts:origin >> > tts:overflow >> > tts:padding >> > tts:position >> > tts:ruby >> > tts:unicodeBidi >> > tts:writingMode >> > tts:zIndex >> > >> > Possible candidates for upgrading to inheritable are: >> > >> > tts:displayAlign >> > tts:showBackground >> > >> > So really, only these two are potentially able to be recast as >> > inheritable >> > in TTML2. All the rest (above) rely on initial value, and, for that >> > matter, >> > initial value also applies to inheritable properties at the top of the >> > inheritance tree (region in TTML1, tt in TTML2). >> > >> > The initial element is already written into the TTML2 spec, implemented, >> > deployed, and previously discussed in the WG (though perhaps we didn't >> > dive >> > in too deeply). >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > though doing so will require careful consideration of >> >> > interoperability with TTML1 behavior. >> >> >> >> I see two scenarios: >> >> >> >> - an author wishes to create a document that conforms to both TTML1 >> >> and TTML2, in which case the author should set the property explicitly >> >> throughout the document -- this is always safe. >> >> >> >> - an author wishes to target only TTML2 processors, in which the >> >> author can rely on the expanded inheritance rules >> >> >> >> Are there other scenarios? >> >> >> >> Best, >> >> >> >> -- Pierre >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux >> >> > <pal@sandflow.com> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi Glenn, >> >> >> >> >> >> > This could also be done in other ways, such as by specifying these >> >> >> > properties on the tt element, >> >> >> > from which all inheritance would occur (in TTML2); however, that >> >> >> > wouldn't work for properties >> >> >> > that don't inherit, like tts:showBackground, etc. >> >> >> >> >> >> Why doesn't tts:showBackground inherit? >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > It was originally defined on region in TTML1, which has no way for a >> >> > region >> >> > to inherit. However, we are adding root element inheritance in TTML2 >> >> > (e.g., >> >> > from tt to head to layout to region). Perhaps we need to review >> >> > uninheritable properties in TTML2 to determine if we need to upgrade >> >> > them to >> >> > inheritable, though doing so will require careful consideration of >> >> > interoperability with TTML1 behavior. >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> >> >> >> -- Pierre >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> > I can provide some respond to this. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux >> >> >> > <pal@sandflow.com> >> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi Dae, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > initial >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> How does Netflix plan to use <initial>? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > The TTT tools already support the initial element with the ttml2 >> >> >> > model, >> >> >> > and >> >> >> > has found it to be very useful in specifying a variety of >> >> >> > non-default, >> >> >> > global style settings, such as default color and font related >> >> >> > properties, >> >> >> > etc. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > For example, the CAP2TT tool in TTT specifies a test configuration >> >> >> > file >> >> >> > that >> >> >> > specifies a template for generating TTML2 output files in which is >> >> >> > specified >> >> >> > the following: >> >> >> > >> >> >> > <initial tts:fontSize="4vh"/> >> >> >> > <initial tts:lineHeight="5vh"/> >> >> >> > <initial tts:showBackground="whenActive"/> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Here, initial is used to alter the default initial value. This >> >> >> > could >> >> >> > also be >> >> >> > done in other ways, such as by specifying these properties on the >> >> >> > tt >> >> >> > element, from which all inheritance would occur (in TTML2); >> >> >> > however, >> >> >> > that >> >> >> > wouldn't work for properties that don't inherit, like >> >> >> > tts:showBackground, >> >> >> > etc. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Note that be using initial to specify an explicit tts:lineHeight, >> >> >> > then >> >> >> > there >> >> >> > is no possibility of using the default initial value of 'normal' >> >> >> > (which >> >> >> > has >> >> >> > been a problem with IMSC content). >> >> >> > >> >> >> > It is also useful for redefining the default initial value of >> >> >> > tts:backgroundColor and resolving the platform dependent default >> >> >> > initial >> >> >> > value of tts:color. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > > >
Received on Tuesday, 2 February 2016 20:28:05 UTC