Re: Call for Consensus: Adoption of W3C 2015 Process

Yes, we should do this (to avoid any doubt).

> On Dec 4, 2015, at 5:58 , Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> We resolved in Geneva [1] to adopt the 2014 W3C Process [2]. As per the
> Process Transition 2015 wiki page [3] this was superseded by the 2015
> Process on 2015-09-01. However we are formally only recommended by [3] to
> adopt the 2015 process:
> 
>> Any group who was publishing under the 2014 Process should start
>> publishing under the 2015 Process as of 1 September 2015.
> 
> As you can see from [3] the list of changes is minimal and highly unlikely
> to have any impact on our operating procedures in the Timed Text Working
> Group.
> 
> However I would like to resolve our status with regards to the 2015
> Process and therefore I propose to adopt the 2015 Process across all of
> the group's in-development publications.
> 
> Please respond with any objections - if none are received then this will
> become a Resolution according to our Decision Policy on Friday 18th
> December 2015.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Nigel
> 
> 
> [1] Minutes of 2014-09-17:
> http://www.w3.org/2014/09/17-tt-minutes.html#item04
> [2] 2014 Process: http://www.w3.org/2014/Process-20140801/
> [3] Process Transition 2015 wiki page:
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/ProcessTransition2015#When_does_the_new_Process_tak
> e_effect.3F
> [4] 2015 Process: http://www.w3.org/2015/Process-20150901/
> 

David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.

Received on Friday, 4 December 2015 19:18:38 UTC