W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > September 2014

Re: ISSUE-327 (IMSC should meet W3C QA Framework Spec guidelines): IMSC should meet W3C QA Framework Spec guidelines [TTML IMSC 1.0]

From: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:54:20 -0700
Message-ID: <CAF_7JxDypA9rG0vUMa5c0OyzoJDUhri_onvZ1FGMjnpf4NkVZA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Timed Text Working Group <public-tt@w3.org>
Rationalized defined terms at https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/rev/7221f45db85f .

-- Pierre

On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 3:16 AM, Timed Text Working Group Issue
Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
> ISSUE-327 (IMSC should meet W3C QA Framework Spec guidelines): IMSC should meet W3C QA Framework Spec guidelines [TTML IMSC 1.0]
>
> http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/327
>
> Raised by: Nigel Megitt
> On product: TTML IMSC 1.0
>
> This issue is a catch-all for meeting W3C specification QA framework guidelines, which is needs to do. Guidelines can be viewed at http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/ and a primer for this topic can be viewed at http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/qaframe-primer
>
> To get to LC (and beyond) IMSC must meet all requirements of the QA framework rec, and as many best practices as possible (or if not, there should be a clear reason). For example at the present time there is no consolidated glossary of defined terms, so good practice 9 is not met.
>
> This is an editorial task.
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2014 23:55:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 5 October 2017 18:24:18 UTC