W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > May 2014

Re: ISSUE-317 (IMSC should not require frame alignment): IMSC should not require frame alignment [TTML IMSC 1.0]

From: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 15:34:26 +0000
To: Michael Dolan <mdolan@newtbt.com>, "'Timed Text Working Group'" <public-tt@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CFA3D50A.1E29B%nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
On 22/05/2014 15:40, "Michael Dolan" <mdolan@newtbt.com> wrote:

>This is a complex topic and absolutely required to provide coded
>frame-level text/video sync.

I don't believe that frame-level text/video sync is the requirement though
- the text needs to be synced against media time, and so does the video,
and so does the audio.

>It is, I believe, impossible for an author to enable sync to display

I think that's an academic point - what's needed is for the author to
specify times as precisely as she/he is able to, and the processor to
honour those as closely as it can. The frame rate of the video that the
author is creating captions for can not always be guaranteed in the
workflow to be the same as the frame rate of the video being played back
with those captions. I'm arguing that the processor and display
combination should try to honour the authored times as accurately as
possible independently of the encoded video frame rate for playback.


>	Mike
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Timed Text Working Group Issue Tracker
>Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 3:20 AM
>To: public-tt@w3.org
>Subject: ISSUE-317 (IMSC should not require frame alignment): IMSC should
>not require frame alignment [TTML IMSC 1.0]
>ISSUE-317 (IMSC should not require frame alignment): IMSC should not
>require frame alignment [TTML IMSC 1.0]
>Raised by: Nigel Megitt
>On product: TTML IMSC 1.0
>IMSC 1.0 4.4 [1] currently requires temporal quantisation of media times
>to frame display times. This rule comes into play when times are not
>expressed in frames, and therefore the same document may apply to a range
>of related media objects covering different frame rates. In the case when
>frames are used the document can only be displayed alongside media of the
>same frame rate so there's no need for the frame alignment expression.
>This approach prevents implementations from changing caption display at
>screen refresh rate quantisation and enforces quantisation based on the
>encoded video frame rate. This means that if a low frame rate video is
>provided, e.g. quarter rate which could be around 6 frames per second,
>the effective word reading rate may be increased to the point where text
>becomes hard to read.
>Consider a streaming environment in which there is enough network
>capacity to provide audio and captions but the video experience is badly
>impacted: in this case it must be permitted that the implementation
>continue to present captions alongside the audio regardless of the frames
>of video that are displayed.
>I propose a solution to this problem that implementations SHALL display
>captions as temporally close to the media time specified as the display
>device permits, independent of video frame rate.
>Note that where frames are used in media time expressions this reduces to
>exactly the current behaviour.
Received on Thursday, 22 May 2014 15:34:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:43:35 UTC