- From: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 15:06:54 +0000
- To: Timed Text Working Group <public-tt@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CF59EEAA.1B5F6%nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
Minutes available at: http://www.w3.org/2014/03/27-tt-minutes.html [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ - DRAFT - Timed Text Working Group Teleconference 27 Mar 2014 See also: [2]IRC log [2] http://www.w3.org/2014/03/27-tt-irc Attendees Present glenn, nigel, pal, plh, jdsmith, Frans_EBU Regrets tmichel Chair nigel Scribe nigel Contents * [3]Topics 1. [4]Charter 2. [5]IMSC approach proposal (PAL) 3. [6]TPAC 2014 4. [7]Action Items 5. [8]Issues discussed over the last week * [9]Summary of Action Items __________________________________________________________ <trackbot> Date: 27 March 2014 <glenn> getting coffee, brb <plh> [10]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2014Jan Mar/0069.html [10] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2014JanMar/0069.html <plh> [11]http://www.w3.org/2014/03/timed-text-charter.html [11] http://www.w3.org/2014/03/timed-text-charter.html Charter <scribe> scribeNick: nigel plh: Process: after 45 days people who didn't rejoin the group will be automatically kicked out. The 45 days start today. ... members need to go back to their AC rep and tell them to rejoin - should allow simple one click reappointment nigel: Section 6 of the charter has a revised Decision Policy ... motivation is to clarify the situation especially as we will have two modes of working. plh: this allows for better asynchronous decision making and has been adopted in other groups too. ... that's why it says 'for 10 days decisions are provisional'. We expect the WebVTT part of the group to work more asynchronously. nigel: Thanks for doing the new charter! plh: I made one small edit to the milestones - the TTML2 CR milestone is pushed back by one month to take into account the August 'dead month' ... and the WebVTT milestones were pushed by 3 months. <plh> [12]http://www.w3.org/2014/03/ttml-diff.html [12] http://www.w3.org/2014/03/ttml-diff.html plh: this is the link to a diff from the AC review version of the charter. IMSC approach proposal (PAL) pal: the plan so far for IMSC had been for IMSC to reference TTML2. We still have a long list of issues to resolve so it looks like it won't be ready when we intended it to be ready, which ... means that IMSC would be delayed, according to the current plan. THere are some users of IMSC that are really interested in it in its current form, ... and there are other users that are interested in it in a more extended form that would be dependent on TTML2. ... So I've been exploring a plan to deliver IMSC 1.0 based on TTML1 and follow up with IMSC 2.0 to go alongside TTML2. ... IMSC 1.0 could go today and there are implementations to demonstrate it. As TTML2 makes progress we'll work on IMSC 2.0 and publish that when it's ready. ... I've not heard any fundamental obstacles. The first step in the plan is to see if there's any reason not to go ahead with it. ... Then start the process by publishing IMSC 1.0 as a FPWD and get started on it. nigel: notes that the charter milestones didn't push IMSC to match the end point of TTML2 plh: agrees that he didn't ... I'm no longer allowed to touch the charter! nigel: Decision to deliver IMSC as two versions, v2.0 to roughly match TTML2 in milestones. pal: I'm assuming that we won't get surprises in comments but maybe we will. I can start working on tweaking the current ED to match the new direction ... and to get the ED ready for a FPWD. nigel: it would be good to have a summary document describing the publication approach for IMSC either to put on the wiki or publish as a note. Action pal to draft a summary document on the wiki and post a link to it on the reflector <trackbot> Created ACTION-277 - Draft a summary document on the wiki and post a link to it on the reflector [on Pierre-Anthony Lemieux - due 2014-04-03]. TPAC 2014 [13]https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/34314/TPAC2014Planning/ [13] https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/34314/TPAC2014Planning/ nigel: if members could respond to this then that would be helpful. glenn: I think there should be a f2f and quite liked the Monday and Friday schedule, which was the least disruptive with respect to other groups. nigel: the poll closes on 1st May and we can make the decision in May. action-274? <trackbot> action-274 -- Nigel Megitt to Discuss with david singer possibilities for f2f before going ahead and adding ttwg to tpac agenda. -- due 2014-03-27 -- OPEN <trackbot> [14]http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/274 [14] http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/274 action-274: discussions have begun, still ongoing. <trackbot> Notes added to action-274 Discuss with david singer possibilities for f2f before going ahead and adding ttwg to tpac agenda.. Action Items action-276? <trackbot> action-276 -- Nigel Megitt to Request tracker default change to 'email' -- due 2014-03-27 -- OPEN <trackbot> [15]http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/276 [15] http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/276 plh: I will find the request and ping them. Issues discussed over the last week action-215? <trackbot> action-215 -- Glenn Adams to Specify special semantics for tts:{extent, origin} on content elements to map to new inline region feature -- due 2014-04-01 -- PENDINGREVIEW <trackbot> [16]http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/215 [16] http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/215 issue-176? <trackbot> issue-176 -- Adding support for extent and origin attributes on block elements -- pending review <trackbot> [17]http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/176 [17] http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/176 <glenn> [18]https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/raw-file/tip/ttml2/spec/ttml2.h tml [18] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/raw-file/tip/ttml2/spec/ttml2.html glenn: this is technical and substantive - you can view it at the currently published ED link ... the main changes are in the terminology section 2.2 to define 'implied inline region' - there's already an 'inline region' ... and in the section 7.1.4 and 7.1.5 on div and p, wording on extent and origin creating an inline region. ... there's a matching change in the styling definition of tts:extent and tts:origin in 8.2.8 and 8.2.15 I added div and p as elements that the style attribute applies to ... and added a paragraph on each of those sections. ... The follow ons are in section 9.3.2 which is empty at the moment and I need to fill it in and discuss Implied Inline Regions here. ... finally in Appendix D.1 I've added an editorial note to add features for these. ... I applied this to both div and p though the original proposal was for p only. Both are block level elements that can generate regions so they should ... both have the opportunity to use implied inline regions. nigel: what's the order of precedence if both a region reference and an extent and origin are specified? glenn: it's possible to have more than one region already on a content element so this would map the content to all the regions including the inline implied region. ... I need to deal with those semantics in the tbs section 9.3.2. As a placeholder in the meantime I'll make an action. <glenn> action glenn to add EDNOTE to 9.3.2 with reminder to deal with case of having multiple inline regions possibly with additional reference to out-of-line region <trackbot> Created ACTION-278 - Add ednote to 9.3.2 with reminder to deal with case of having multiple inline regions possibly with additional reference to out-of-line region [on Glenn Adams - due 2014-04-03]. glenn: I've added this to the change list document <glenn> [19]https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/raw-file/tip/ttml2/spec/ttml2-c hanges.html [19] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/raw-file/tip/ttml2/spec/ttml2-changes.html nigel: you've also updated CP2 to a PENDING REVIEW state glenn: and I added a Resolution section. nigel: Jerry you own CP2 so please could you review? [20]https://www.w3.org/wiki/TTML/changeProposal002 [20] https://www.w3.org/wiki/TTML/changeProposal002 issue-285? <trackbot> issue-285 -- Align rendered rows within a region to each other, and the set to the region -- open <trackbot> [21]http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/285 [21] http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/285 [22]https://www.w3.org/wiki/TTML/changeProposal015#multiple_row _alignment_.28flex_box_in_CSS_mapping.29 [22] https://www.w3.org/wiki/TTML/changeProposal015#multiple_row_alignment_.28flex_box_in_CSS_mapping.29 nigel: I added use of the justify-content property and the mapping from multiRowAlign values Issue-286? <trackbot> Issue-286 -- Extend the background area behind rendered text to improve readability -- open <trackbot> [23]http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/286 [23] http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/286 [24]https://www.w3.org/wiki/TTML/changeProposal015#box-decorati on-break [24] https://www.w3.org/wiki/TTML/changeProposal015#box-decoration-break nigel: last week pierre asked: Are TTML 1 processors expected to ignore TTML 2 attributes that are in the same namespace at TTML 1? Is this the case in practice? glenn: what the spec says and what processors do and should do are separate questions. ... we'll probably need to put something in the conformance section of TTML2 on this subject and we may need to add some details to the abstract document type filtering mechanism ... that filters out foreign namespace. The normal behaviour should be to ignore anything not understood as long as it can still be parsed. ... A TTML1 doc with TTML2 features is not valid, strictly. But a TTML2 doc would be fine - then how does a TTML1 processor deal with that? ... We're not going to use a new namespace for TTML2 but extend the existing one so we need something in the document itself stating that it was ... authored with TTML2 features in mind. I believe there's a proposal to add a version attribute e.g. ttp:version to do just that. I haven't thought ... further than that. ... I will try to dig out the issue on this. ... this is Issue-276 [25]http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/276 [25] http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/276 glenn: issue-203 is closed but also relevant. It added ttp:version to TTML2 issue-302? <trackbot> issue-302 -- Should background of a span be height of text in line or computed lineHeight? -- raised <trackbot> [26]http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/302 [26] http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/302 glenn: I did some testing on this and verified that CSS behaviour results in backgrounds on spans that do not extend to the height of the line box ... that seemed to be consistent across browsers. What I don't recall is what I had implemented in the dfxp viewer because this came up then. ... It's not very well defined in CSS, what the right answer is. We do have the mapping to HTML/CSS issue. If we rely on CSS to implement ... the formatting we're going to work out how to live with this. ... notes that EBU-TT has already extended TTML to include padding. This isn't particularly easy to use. issue-303? <trackbot> issue-303 -- Permit HTML-style <a> elements to contain href links -- raised <trackbot> [27]http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/303 [27] http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/303 nigel: we don't have time to discuss this now! Summary of Action Items [End of minutes] __________________________________________________________ Minutes formatted by David Booth's [28]scribe.perl version 1.138 ([29]CVS log) $Date: 2014-03-27 15:04:17 $ __________________________________________________________ ---------------------------- http://www.bbc.co.uk This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. ---------------------
Received on Thursday, 27 March 2014 15:07:29 UTC