- From: John Birch <John.Birch@screensystems.tv>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 08:19:38 +0000
- To: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>, TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <0981DC6F684DE44FBE8E2602C456E8AB016C0B70EE@SS-IP-EXMB-01.screensystems.tv>
Hi Nigel, I don't recall any debate on the mailing lists. When using SMPTE timecode *in the context of subtitling*, external context would dictate whether it is possible to calculate intervals between SMPTE timecode values. i.e. regardless of any attribute in the TTML file, only the external context truly knows if the 'matching' AV asset has continuous timecode. Even if a file is attributed as discontinuous markerMode, a processor might determine that the external AV asset is continuous (by examination of all frames for example) and thus determine intervals. In general for me, the actual markerMode is a moot point, since I would generally expect a processor to act 'intelligently'... that is, treat the timecodes as markers (for in an out cues)... and perhaps only use timecode arithmetic if it was in possession of a 'bigger picture' of the timeline of the associated AV material. But, this is only my perspective from a subtitling point of view... If markerMode is deprecated, I would strongly suggest that all SMPTE timecodes are markers. I.e. the effective markerMode is then always 'discontinuous'. Best regards, John John Birch | Strategic Partnerships Manager | Screen Main Line : +44 1473 831700 | Ext : 2208 | Direct Dial : +44 1473 834532 Mobile : +44 7919 558380 | Fax : +44 1473 830078 John.Birch@screensystems.tv<mailto:John.Birch@screensystems.tv> | www.screensystems.tv<http://www.screensystems.tv> | https://twitter.com/screensystems Visit us at IBC, RAI Amsterdam, 12-16 Sept, stand 1.C49 P Before printing, think about the environment From: Nigel Megitt [mailto:nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk] Sent: 11 July 2014 15:03 To: TTWG Subject: deprecating markerMode All, we noted in TTML1SE that ttp:markerMode may be deprecated, removing the possibility of using the value continuous (NB this is relevant only when timeBase = smpte). Can anyone remind me where the debate is on this? We don't seem to have an issue open for it and I don't recall discussing it. Kind regards, Nigel -- Nigel Megitt Lead Technologist, BBC Technology, Distribution & Archives Telephone: +44 (0)3030807996 Internal (Lync): 0807996 BC4 A3 Broadcast Centre, Media Village, 201 Wood Lane, London W12 7TP This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. Screen Subtitling Systems Ltd. Registered in England No. 2596832. Registered Office: The Old Rectory, Claydon Church Lane, Claydon, Ipswich, Suffolk, IP6 0EQ
Received on Monday, 14 July 2014 08:20:08 UTC