- From: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 16:31:13 +0000
- To: Timed Text Working Group <public-tt@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CF102E7E.187E4%nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
Available at: http://www.w3.org/2014/01/30-tt-minutes.html
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
Timed Text Working Group Teleconference
30 Jan 2014
See also: [2]IRC log
[2] http://www.w3.org/2014/01/30-tt-irc
Attendees
Present
Nigel_Megitt, Glenn_Adams, Thierry_Michel,
Frans_de_Jong, Pierre_Lemieux, Jerry_Smith
Regrets
Mike, Dolan, plh
Chair
nigel
Scribe
pal, nigel
Contents
* [3]Topics
1. [4]IANA Registration of TTML media type
2. [5]Charter
3. [6]Line Height stacking and calculation
4. [7]Remaining Pending Review actions
5. [8]Pending Review Issues
6. [9]Change Proposals
7. [10]AOB
* [11]Summary of Action Items
__________________________________________________________
<trackbot> Date: 30 January 2014
<glenn> morning
<tmichel> I am unable to join Zakim from the ERCIM office for
unknow reason ...
<tmichel> Keep trying ...
<nigel> will try to keep IRC up to date
<nigel> scribeNick: pal
IANA Registration of TTML media type
<nigel> plh has been at CSS meetings and may be at SVG meeting
today
<glenn> [12]http://www.w3.org/2013/09/ttml1-errata.html
[12] http://www.w3.org/2013/09/ttml1-errata.html
<nigel> glenn: copied appendix C into the Errata, and changed
the encoding to binary.
<nigel> action-88?
<trackbot> action-88 -- Glenn Adams to Make sure the TTML media
type is properly registered for Issue-175. -- due 2013-10-31 --
OPEN
<trackbot>
[13]http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/88
[13] http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/88
<nigel> action-88: Errata now updated. Mike to check and if
looking good to resubmit to IANA.
<trackbot> Notes added to action-88 Make sure the TTML media
type is properly registered for Issue-175..
<nigel> glenn: reassigning the action to Mike Dolan
Charter
<nigel> nigel: Following emails over the last week or two the
charter will be reverted to use the normal license, i.e. not
adopt the HTML experimental license for VTT.
<nigel> ... It's hoped that this will mitigate a likely AC
objection.
<nigel> ... Philippe will take this to AC no later than Feb 5.
<nigel> action-248?
<trackbot> action-248 -- Philippe Le Hégaret to Add atsc to the
ttml charter -- due 2013-12-12 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot>
[14]http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/248
[14] http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/248
<nigel> [15]http://www.w3.org/2013/10/timed-text-charter.html
[15] http://www.w3.org/2013/10/timed-text-charter.html
<nigel> NB this has not yet been edited to remove the VTT
experimental license wording.
<nigel> close action-248
<trackbot> Closed action-248.
<nigel> action-259?
<trackbot> action-259 -- Philippe Le Hégaret to Add ebu wording
in charter -- due 2014-01-23 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot>
[16]http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/259
[16] http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/259
<nigel> close action-259
<trackbot> Closed action-259.
Line Height stacking and calculation
<nigel> action-260?
<trackbot> action-260 -- Nigel Megitt to Email group notifying
of this change and initiating formal approval -- due 2014-01-23
-- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot>
[17]http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/260
[17] http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/260
<nigel> close action-260
<trackbot> Closed action-260.
<nigel> nigel: pal asked if it would be back-ported to TTML1.
The answer was no.
<glenn> i have a call on the side, so will be back in a few
mins
<nigel> nigel: no further queries therefore group accepts
glenn's algorithm proposal.
<nigel> pal: I asked a question to glenn for an example of how
we would expect a paragraph with a lineHeight of 125% and a
fontSize of 10% and a span of 48px font size. How would we
expect it to look?
For instance, how do we expect <p tts:fontSize="10px"
tts: fontFamily="arial" tts:lineHeight="125%"><span
... fontSize="48px">...</span>...</p> to behave, e.g. will the
height
of each line be the same and, if so, what will the value be? If
tts: lineHeight="125%" and tts:fontSize="10px", what will be
the height
of three lines?
<nigel>
[18]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2014Jan/0022.
html
[18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2014Jan/0022.html
<nigel>
[19]https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/raw-file/default/ttml2/spec/ttm
l2.html#style-attribute-lineHeight
[19] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/raw-file/default/ttml2/spec/ttml2.html#style-attribute-lineHeight
<nigel> nigel: the proposed algorithm is for
lineHeight="normal" so that's a separate issue.
<nigel> nigel: Jerry were you able to confirm this in IE?
<nigel> jdsmith: I sent glenn some screenshots. IE11 matches
the behaviour of Chrome.
<nigel> ... on both Windows 8 and Windows 7. Glenn responded
that this confirmed his expectation. There were some alignment
differences in previous versions of IE.
<nigel> action on glenn to take algorithm from TTML2 ED 8.2.13
tts:lineHeight to CSS WG for review and potential adoption.
<trackbot> Error finding 'on'. You can review and register
nicknames at
<[20]http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/users>.
[20] http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/users%3E.
<nigel> action glenn to take algorithm from TTML2 ED 8.2.13
tts:lineHeight to CSS WG for review and potential adoption.
<trackbot> Created ACTION-265 - Take algorithm from ttml2 ed
8.2.13 tts:lineheight to css wg for review and potential
adoption. [on Glenn Adams - due 2014-02-06].
Remaining Pending Review actions
<nigel> action-164?
<trackbot> action-164 -- Jerry Smith to Investigate interop
issues using CSS familyName constructs -- due 2013-12-05 --
PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot>
[21]http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/164
[21] http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/164
<nigel> jdsmith: there are some outstanding issues and someone
needs to make a proposal to align Unicode escapes with CSS to
avoid pre-parsing if possible.
<glenn> back
<nigel> close action-164
<trackbot> Closed action-164.
<nigel> action-203?
<trackbot> action-203 -- Glenn Adams to Investigate 708 border
style mapping issues with mike's help -- due 2013-09-26 --
PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot>
[22]http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/203
[22] http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/203
<nigel> action-207?
<trackbot> action-207 -- Glenn Adams to Add round-down
clarification to "closest" language, see issue-259 -- due
2013-09-26 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot>
[23]http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/207
[23] http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/207
<nigel> issue-259?
<trackbot> issue-259 -- Define "closest" -- pending review
<trackbot>
[24]http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/259
[24] http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/259
<nigel> reopen action-207
<trackbot> Re-opened action-207.
<nigel> action-207: glenn to add errata to distinguish between
scalar and vector comparisons
<trackbot> Notes added to action-207 Add round-down
clarification to "closest" language, see issue-259.
<nigel> reopen issue-259
<trackbot> Re-opened issue-259.
<nigel> issue-259: Scalar and vector comparisons need to be
distinguished more clearly.
<trackbot> Notes added to issue-259 Define "closest".
<nigel> action-244?
<trackbot> action-244 -- Pierre-Anthony Lemieux to Proceed with
work to investigate deltas. if time doesn't allow the fallback
is to remove annex a. -- due 2013-12-19 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot>
[25]http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/244
[25] http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/244
<nigel> glenn: A note on the action to explain the findings
would be useful.
<nigel> action-244: pal to add disclaimer text to table 2
<trackbot> Notes added to action-244 Proceed with work to
investigate deltas. if time doesn't allow the fallback is to
remove annex a..
<nigel> reopen action-244
<trackbot> Re-opened action-244.
Pending Review Issues
<nigel> issue-162?
<trackbot> issue-162 -- update standalone profile documents --
pending review
<trackbot>
[26]http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/162
[26] http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/162
<nigel> nigel: No feedback received on this - let's close.
<nigel> close issue-162
<trackbot> Closed issue-162.
<nigel> action-261?
<trackbot> action-261 -- Jerry Smith to And glenn to verify
flexbox solution to multi row align using ie -- due 2014-01-23
-- OPEN
<trackbot>
[27]http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/261
[27] http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/261
<nigel> nigel: have added a comment to action 261 directly
<nigel> close action-261
<trackbot> Closed action-261.
<nigel> nigel: not going through remaining outstanding actions
to use time on change proposals
Change Proposals
<nigel> scribeNick: nigel
action-263?
<trackbot> action-263 -- Nigel Megitt to Tidy change proposal
index page to include an index -- due 2014-01-23 --
PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot>
[28]http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/263
[28] http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/263
[29]https://www.w3.org/wiki/TTML/ChangeProposalIndex
[29] https://www.w3.org/wiki/TTML/ChangeProposalIndex
nigel: glenn, does this do wanted?
glenn: I think we should make change proposals coincident with
work packages and eliminate work packages.
nigel: updates page to this effect.
glenn: it would also be good to show the name of the assignee.
pal: Suggests clarification of Issues vs Change Proposals would
be worthwhile.
glenn: Other WGs using the same process e.g. HTMLWG.
nigel: bugs are just issues, new features need issues within
change proposals.
glenn: Often a 'don't change' proposal goes alongside a change
proposal.
... I agree that a new feature should have a change proposal to
give the rationale etc. and it may be useful to document that
in the index page Overview.
... We're missing a WG process to describe how we use these
different tools e.g. actions, issues and change proposals.
close action-263
<trackbot> Closed action-263.
action nigel to describe WG process, issues, actions, change
proposals on WG wiki more clearly, including taking out
remaining references to work packages from change proposal
index page overview.
<trackbot> Created ACTION-266 - Describe wg process, issues,
actions, change proposals on wg wiki more clearly, including
taking out remaining references to work packages from change
proposal index page overview. [on Nigel Megitt - due
2014-02-06].
nigel: no progress on action-262
... will complete action-264 tomorrow. Some issues have no CP,
others have more than one. Most are in a CP though.
... requests that people take ownership of the change proposals
and expand the rationale etc to make them well formed.
pal: Can we clarify the distinction between issues and change
proposals?
glenn: Issues should be Problem Statements and the issue text
could include a proposed solution. If it's more than a simple
proposal then a CP is useful to more fully document it.
... There may be competing CPs for a single issue. In the past
we have not used the CP mechanism very much and have just
thrown everything over the fence to the editor who came up with
a solution and put it in the spec.
... rather than going through an intermediate discussion via a
CP.
... We should try to elaborate proposed solutions more in the
CP before the Editor brings the change in. This gives the group
the chance to sign up to the change before the Editor folds it
in.
nigel: It's also worth considering differnt problems
collectively to generate coherent solutions.
glenn: take for example issue-229 - it would be good to put a
proposed solution into the change proposal (21).
pal: issue-229 has some of the rationale and background
already.
glenn: The CP should propose a solution.
... the CP allows us to develop the solution alongside the
rationale to address the set of issues. It can be at varying
levels of specificity in terms of the exact edits to make.
... It's also really helpful to create examples, e.g. for the
more complex style properties. The less work for the editor the
quicker the change gets into the spec.
pal: Sounds great.
nigel: [misses some conversation about CP and process wrt
tracker]
pal: The issues are sometimes completely independent.
glenn: in that case they should have separate CPs.
nigel: we need to get ownership on these CPs - we can do this
by volunteering or by me volunteering them.
glenn: I'm of the 'pick a victim' preference.
pal: the majority issue owner should be assigned the CP.
jdsmith: I can take on Sean's CPs.
nigel: thanks, I'll reassign them to you.
AOB
rssagent, make logs public
Summary of Action Items
[End of minutes]
__________________________________________________________
----------------------------
http://www.bbc.co.uk
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to this.
---------------------
Received on Thursday, 30 January 2014 16:31:52 UTC