- From: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 16:40:17 +0000
- To: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
- CC: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>, TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
I’m not sure how fast moving this document is - a lot of the requirements look very familiar. I agree in principle that we can’t track a moving target though, hence the suggestion that we take a snapshot at the moment we need to do the conformance check. Of course we also have the option to provide input to the document. On 19/08/2014 17:35, "Pierre-Anthony Lemieux" <pal@sandflow.com> wrote: >Hi Nigel, > >The point is that the recommendations might fluctuate with time, and >it is not reasonable IMSC 1 and TTML 2 to track a moving target given >their timeline. > >Best, > >-- Pierre > >On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> >wrote: >> The requirements we assess the Recommendations against do not need to be >> normative so I think it is reasonable for us to take a snapshot if they >> are not stable. >> >> >> >> On 19/08/2014 17:30, "Pierre-Anthony Lemieux" <pal@sandflow.com> wrote: >> >>>Aren't these specification working drafts, and thus subject to change? >>>If so, it is probably not reasonable to make TTML 2 and IMSC 1 >>>contingent on them given their timeline. >>> >>>Best, >>> >>>-- Pierre >>> >>>On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> >>>wrote: >>>> Thanks for the heads-up Glenn. It looks like these bits: >>>> >>>>http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-media-accessibility-reqs-20140814/#caption >>>>in >>>>g >>>> and >>>> >>>>http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-media-accessibility-reqs-20140814/#enhance >>>>d- >>>>captions-subtitles >>>> are particularly relevant to us. >>>> >>>> Would anyone object to adopting those requirements as a subset of the >>>> requirements that TTML 2 and IMSC 1 should be measured against when >>>> assessing their conformance when it comes to LC/CR as per the process >>>>for >>>> publishing Recommendations (either the old or the new process)? >>>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>> >>>> Nigel >>>> >>>> From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> >>>> Date: Tuesday, 19 August 2014 16:59 >>>> To: TTWG <public-tt@w3.org> >>>> Subject: FYI - Media Accessibility User Requirements WD >>>> Resent-From: <public-tt@w3.org> >>>> Resent-Date: Tuesday, 19 August 2014 17:00 >>>> >>>> Media Accessibility User Requirements Working Draft Updated >>>> >>>> 14 August 2014 | Archive >>>> >>>> http://www.w3.org/blog/news/archives/4024 >>>> >>>> The Protocols and Formats Working Group (PFWG) today published >>>> an updated Working Draft of "Media Accessibility User >>>> Requirements," a planned W3C Working Group Note. This document >>>> describes the accessibility requirements of people with >>>> disabilities with respect to audio and video on the Web, >>>> particularly in the context of HTML5. It explains alternative >>>> content technologies that people use to get audio and video >>>> content, and how these fit in the larger picture of >>>> accessibility, both technically within a web user agent and >>>> from a production process point of view. Learn more about the >>>> Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI). >>>> >>>> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/ >>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-media-accessibility-reqs-20140814/ >>>> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ >>
Received on Tuesday, 19 August 2014 16:40:48 UTC