- From: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 09:35:24 -0700
- To: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
- Cc: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>, TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
Hi Nigel, The point is that the recommendations might fluctuate with time, and it is not reasonable IMSC 1 and TTML 2 to track a moving target given their timeline. Best, -- Pierre On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> wrote: > The requirements we assess the Recommendations against do not need to be > normative so I think it is reasonable for us to take a snapshot if they > are not stable. > > > > On 19/08/2014 17:30, "Pierre-Anthony Lemieux" <pal@sandflow.com> wrote: > >>Aren't these specification working drafts, and thus subject to change? >>If so, it is probably not reasonable to make TTML 2 and IMSC 1 >>contingent on them given their timeline. >> >>Best, >> >>-- Pierre >> >>On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> >>wrote: >>> Thanks for the heads-up Glenn. It looks like these bits: >>> >>>http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-media-accessibility-reqs-20140814/#captionin >>>g >>> and >>> >>>http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-media-accessibility-reqs-20140814/#enhanced- >>>captions-subtitles >>> are particularly relevant to us. >>> >>> Would anyone object to adopting those requirements as a subset of the >>> requirements that TTML 2 and IMSC 1 should be measured against when >>> assessing their conformance when it comes to LC/CR as per the process >>>for >>> publishing Recommendations (either the old or the new process)? >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> >>> Nigel >>> >>> From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> >>> Date: Tuesday, 19 August 2014 16:59 >>> To: TTWG <public-tt@w3.org> >>> Subject: FYI - Media Accessibility User Requirements WD >>> Resent-From: <public-tt@w3.org> >>> Resent-Date: Tuesday, 19 August 2014 17:00 >>> >>> Media Accessibility User Requirements Working Draft Updated >>> >>> 14 August 2014 | Archive >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/blog/news/archives/4024 >>> >>> The Protocols and Formats Working Group (PFWG) today published >>> an updated Working Draft of "Media Accessibility User >>> Requirements," a planned W3C Working Group Note. This document >>> describes the accessibility requirements of people with >>> disabilities with respect to audio and video on the Web, >>> particularly in the context of HTML5. It explains alternative >>> content technologies that people use to get audio and video >>> content, and how these fit in the larger picture of >>> accessibility, both technically within a web user agent and >>> from a production process point of view. Learn more about the >>> Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI). >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/ >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-media-accessibility-reqs-20140814/ >>> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ >
Received on Tuesday, 19 August 2014 16:36:11 UTC