Re: Use of Old TTML1.0 CR Namespace URIs

Yes. I spend a lot of time on this. Bad namespaces ant attributes will fail UV validation, so am inclined to reject them. FYI there are even pre-pub namespaces still in use in the silo'd systems.

Sent from my phone

On Jun 3, 2013, at 7:54 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:

> I've been noticing some TTML content generators still using the old TTML1.0 CR namespace URIs, which used a prefix of:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/10/ttaf1
> 
> This was changed to the following with the publishing of the 3rd CR of TTML 1.0 on 2010-02-23:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/ns/ttml
> 
> This presents a significant interoperability issue for attempts to promote validated TTML1.0 content. Should the WG reach out to tool vendors to try to curtail this usage?
> 
> I also noticed in this content use of the old ttp:smpteMode parameter, which we renamed to ttp:dropMode when we published the second CR on 2009-09-24.
> 
> Are there TTML processors out there that are silently accepting this invalid usage which should be "fixed" to reject this no longer valid content?