- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 06:20:51 -0600
- To: John Birch <John.Birch@screensystems.tv>
- Cc: David Ronca <dronca@netflix.com>, "public-tt@w3.org" <public-tt@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACQ=j+dpsVBQTz=qDB4MTYRJf7i5U3dhe4x3EMfXz4qmWer6xg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 3:33 AM, John Birch <John.Birch@screensystems.tv>wrote: > Hi David, Richard,**** > > ** ** > > Yes, this is an interesting aspect of TTML.**** > > ** ** > > TTML uses the <p> element from a presentation perspective. At any point in > time, the <p> elements hold the content that is active at that moment. > Actually, I have to disagree with John on this point. TTML does not favor either presentation or semantic usage. It is up to the author to choose their intended usage, and it has been shown that the same timing in this example can be accomplished within a single <p/>. > **** > > ** ** > > However, from a narrative perspective it would be preferable that the <p> > element would hold content that is related from a narrative structure > perspective.**** > > This is something that I would hope we can embrace in EBU-TT Part 5. In > Part 5 it is possible that the timing may be subservient to the narrative… > i.e. the timing might be considered a notation against a structured text > content rather than having the timing dominate the document as in current > TTML implementations.**** > > ** ** > > Best regards,**** > > John**** > > ** ** > > *John Birch | Strategic Partnerships Manager | Screen > *Main Line : +44 1473 831700 | Ext : 270 | Direct Dial : +44 1473 834532 > Mobile : +44 7919 558380 | Fax : +44 1473 830078 > John.Birch@screensystems.tv | www.screensystems.tv | > https://twitter.com/screensystems**** > > *Visit us at > SMPTE conference & exhibition, Stand G35, Sydney Exhibition Centre, > Darling Harbour, 23-26th July* > > *P** Before printing, think about the environment* > > *From:* David Ronca [mailto:dronca@netflix.com] > *Sent:* 03 July 2013 08:32 > *To:* public-tt@w3.org > *Subject:* Re: Question on Timed Text Markup Language (TTML)**** > > ** ** > > The purpose of captioning is to align the text with the spoken dialog and > the video. The paragraph is split across multiple 'p' elements presumably > because that is how it aligns with the spoken dialog. Even sentences are > split. Consider the sentence "Three were given to the Elves, immortal, > wisest...fairest of all beings." in the opening of FOTR. If I remember the > narration timing correctly (deliberate pauses), the split might look > something like this:**** > > ** ** > > <p> Three were given to the Elves</p>**** > > <p> immortal,</p>**** > > <p> wisest...</p>**** > > <p>fairest of all beings.</p>**** > > ** ** > > David**** > > ** ** > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote:*** > * > > Could someone help Richard here ? > > Thanks. > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Question on Timed Text Markup Language (TTML) > Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 12:37:07 +0000 > From: Richard, Francois <francois.richard@hp.com> > > > I work for Hewlett-Packard (actually based in Grenoble) and my group > charter is to deploy Translation tools and technologies within HP. > We recently received some TTML files that we need to process through our > TMS (Translation management system). I had a look at it and I am bit > surprised by the use of paragraph element. In the sample file I received > (see snippet below), the notion of linguistic "paragraph" is not preserved, > resulting in what could considered as concatenation or artificial split of > grammatical sentences: > <p begin='00:00:02.130' end='00:00:04.290' style="4">The print > industry clearly is shrinking</p> > <p begin='00:00:04.290' end='00:00:06.310' style="4">and shrinking > substantially.</p> > > I checked http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-ttaf1-dfxp-20130131/ and I am > surprised to see that it is there too: > > <p xml:id="subtitle1" begin="0.76s" end="3.45s"> > It seems a paradox, does it not, > </p> > <p xml:id="subtitle2" begin="5.0s" end="10.0s"> > that the image formed on<br/> > the Retina should be inverted? > </p> > > Is this done on purpose? I understand there is a need to support some > "timing" information, but I do not understand why defining these attributes > at the <p> element level, forcing grammatical sentences to be split across > multiple "paragraphs".... > Can you help? > > François Richard > Globalization Tec Lead > Digital Publishing and Operations > > francois.richard@hp.com<mailto:francois.richard@hp.com> > T +33 (0)4 76 14 48 71 > F +33 (0)4 76 14 43 05 > > [HP]<http://www.hp.com/> > > Please print thoughtfully > > > > > **** > > ** ** > > This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If > you are not the intended recipient you must not use, copy, disclose or take > any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have > received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by > reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. > Screen Subtitling Systems Ltd. Registered in England No. 2596832. > Registered Office: The Old Rectory, Claydon Church Lane, Claydon, Ipswich, > Suffolk, IP6 0EQ > >
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2013 12:21:39 UTC