- From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 09:10:21 +0200
- To: W3C Public TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
Could someone help Richard here ?
Thanks.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Question on Timed Text Markup Language (TTML)
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 12:37:07 +0000
From: Richard, Francois <francois.richard@hp.com>
I work for Hewlett-Packard (actually based in Grenoble) and my group
charter is to deploy Translation tools and technologies within HP.
We recently received some TTML files that we need to process through our
TMS (Translation management system). I had a look at it and I am bit
surprised by the use of paragraph element. In the sample file I received
(see snippet below), the notion of linguistic "paragraph" is not
preserved, resulting in what could considered as concatenation or
artificial split of grammatical sentences:
<p begin='00:00:02.130' end='00:00:04.290' style="4">The print
industry clearly is shrinking</p>
<p begin='00:00:04.290' end='00:00:06.310' style="4">and
shrinking substantially.</p>
I checked http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-ttaf1-dfxp-20130131/ and I am
surprised to see that it is there too:
<p xml:id="subtitle1" begin="0.76s" end="3.45s">
It seems a paradox, does it not,
</p>
<p xml:id="subtitle2" begin="5.0s" end="10.0s">
that the image formed on<br/>
the Retina should be inverted?
</p>
Is this done on purpose? I understand there is a need to support some
"timing" information, but I do not understand why defining these
attributes at the <p> element level, forcing grammatical sentences to be
split across multiple "paragraphs"....
Can you help?
François Richard
Globalization Tec Lead
Digital Publishing and Operations
francois.richard@hp.com<mailto:francois.richard@hp.com>
T +33 (0)4 76 14 48 71
F +33 (0)4 76 14 43 05
[HP]<http://www.hp.com/>
Please print thoughtfully
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2013 07:10:47 UTC