- From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 09:10:21 +0200
- To: W3C Public TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
Could someone help Richard here ? Thanks. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Question on Timed Text Markup Language (TTML) Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 12:37:07 +0000 From: Richard, Francois <francois.richard@hp.com> I work for Hewlett-Packard (actually based in Grenoble) and my group charter is to deploy Translation tools and technologies within HP. We recently received some TTML files that we need to process through our TMS (Translation management system). I had a look at it and I am bit surprised by the use of paragraph element. In the sample file I received (see snippet below), the notion of linguistic "paragraph" is not preserved, resulting in what could considered as concatenation or artificial split of grammatical sentences: <p begin='00:00:02.130' end='00:00:04.290' style="4">The print industry clearly is shrinking</p> <p begin='00:00:04.290' end='00:00:06.310' style="4">and shrinking substantially.</p> I checked http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-ttaf1-dfxp-20130131/ and I am surprised to see that it is there too: <p xml:id="subtitle1" begin="0.76s" end="3.45s"> It seems a paradox, does it not, </p> <p xml:id="subtitle2" begin="5.0s" end="10.0s"> that the image formed on<br/> the Retina should be inverted? </p> Is this done on purpose? I understand there is a need to support some "timing" information, but I do not understand why defining these attributes at the <p> element level, forcing grammatical sentences to be split across multiple "paragraphs".... Can you help? François Richard Globalization Tec Lead Digital Publishing and Operations francois.richard@hp.com<mailto:francois.richard@hp.com> T +33 (0)4 76 14 48 71 F +33 (0)4 76 14 43 05 [HP]<http://www.hp.com/> Please print thoughtfully
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2013 07:10:47 UTC