- From: David Ronca <dronca@netflix.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 04:20:59 +0000
- To: "public-tt@w3.org" <public-tt@w3.org>
>we have issue 179 related to this namely that : >"we need to clarify the pixel behaviour; in particular we should explain that where extent is used on the tt element this effectively *defines* >the size of a pixel in the sense that the root area extent is still mapped to a video overlay and divided into 'logical pixels'. If such an extent is >not defined on the tt element, then the px measure should probably not be used (or even expressly forbidden)" > In this interpretation it does not imply that the extent covers some specific hardware pixels, but that the region is to be counted as having x by y > pixels; so that the px measure when used within the TTML document has some meaning independent of the hardware. If this is coupled with square > aspect ratio pixels (the default), then by definition the root would have the specified aspect ratio. Let see if I am understanding this. If I have a 1080p video display, and 1080p content, <tt tts:extent="640px,480px"> does not mean to display captions in a 640x480 window, it means to divide the 1920x1080 pixels into 640x480 logical pixels for mapping captions? Further, by using <tt ttp:pixelAspectRatio="1,1", the client would not stretch the caption window horizontally, but would work within a 4:3 region of the video window and the logical pixels would map to 1440x1080 physical pixels?
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2013 04:21:27 UTC