RE: ISSUE-70 (tts:overflow): region background infinite extent [DFXP 1.0]

Yes I see what you mean, but:
"the content-rectangle of the block-container-reference-area (as generated by tt:region) should be considered to be unconstrained (in either block or inline progression directions) for the purpose of performing line breaking (line composition);"

Is a much better sentence. :-)

Sean Hayes
Media Accessibility Strategist
Accessibility Business Unit
Microsoft

Office:  +44 118 909 5867,
Mobile: +44 7875 091385


-----Original Message-----
From: Glenn A. Adams [mailto:gadams@xfsi.com]
Sent: 27 April 2009 8:47 AM
To: Sean Hayes
Cc: Public TTWG List
Subject: Re: ISSUE-70 (tts:overflow): region background infinite extent [DFXP 1.0]


it does not imply anthing regarding region background, since it does not use
the term "rendering"; i.e., it does not say "region composition, layout, and
rendering";

region composition and layout includes only those aspects of formatting that
affect placement of formatted content, and not rendering only styling, such
as background (or foreground) colors;

i'm not sure what you mean by "initial containing block" here; in XSL FO
terms, what this is saying is that the content-rectangle of the
block-container-reference-area (as generated by tt:region) should be
considered to be unconstrained (in either block or inline progression
directions) for the purpose of performing line breaking (line composition);

so i think perhaps nothing is needed here;

On 4/24/09 10:56 PM, "Timed Text Working Group Issue Tracker"
<sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:

>
> ISSUE-70 (tts:overflow): region background infinite extent  [DFXP 1.0]
>
> http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/70
>
> Raised by: Sean Hayes
> On product: DFXP 1.0
>
> "region composition and layout must be performed as if the region's width and
> height were infinite"
>
> This seems to imply that the region background should have infinite extent
> too? I thought rather it implied that the initial containing block has
> infinite extent and that no clipping was performed by the region (as the
> example rendering shows).
> Could we clarify this sentence.
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Monday, 27 April 2009 08:30:25 UTC