- From: Glenn A. Adams <gadams@xfsi.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:21:40 +0800
- To: Sean Hayes <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>, Public TTWG List <public-tt@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <C60E8744.A3DD%gadams@xfsi.com>
lr is shorthand for lrtb rl is shorthand for rltb lrtb rltb tbrl and tblr enumerate the four supported combinations of block progression direction (bpd) and inline progression direction (ipd) as follows bpd ipd lrtb t2b l2r rltb t2b r2l tblr l2r t2b tbrl r2l t2b where t2b is top to bottom, l2r is left to right, r2l is right to left; note that we donıt support any bottom to top modes, or a few other esoteric modes supported by XSL; see http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xsl11-20061205/#writing-mode for more info; On 4/17/09 6:36 PM, "Sean Hayes" <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com> wrote: > We currently allow values of lrtb | rltb | tbrl | tblr | lr | rl | tb | > inherit for the writingMode property. > > But unless Iım missing something, there is no way in the reduced formatting > model of timed text to distinguish between lrtb and rltb modes; since in both > modes mode, I canıt see any way to get two blocks to be placed side by side. > > Is there any distinction we can make between these modes in the test suite? If > not, should we perhaps just restrict the value set to: tbrl | tblr | lr | tb > | inherit ? > > > > Sean Hayes > Media Accessibility Strategist > Accessibility Business Unit > Microsoft >
Received on Friday, 17 April 2009 11:22:27 UTC