- From: Geoff Freed <geoff_freed@wgbh.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 06:49:29 -0500
- To: "Glenn A. Adams" <gadams@xfsi.com>, "public-tt@w3.org" <public-tt@w3.org>
- Cc: Sean Hayes <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>
well, granted it's not the strongest of cases and would, as others have pointed out, lead to ambiguous timing situations, but i wanted to float the proposal anyhow. ccplayer's behavior with regards to captions having begin with no dur or end may be problematic in the test cases, however. onward... g. ________________________________________ From: Glenn A. Adams [gadams@xfsi.com] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 10:29 PM To: Silvia Pfeiffer; Geoff Freed Cc: Sean Hayes; public-tt@w3.org Subject: RE: beginEnd002: par timeContainer and child with no duration I also agree with Silvia, and would oppose the change suggested by Geoff. The proposed change would be a significant departure from SMIL timing semantics, which we have tried to maintain. Geoff, a better way for you to express what you want would be: <div timeContainer="seq"> <p dur='1s'>This test counts from 0 to 10 in 10 seconds.<br/>0</p> <p dur='1s'>This test counts from 0 to 10 in 10 seconds.<br/>1</p> <p dur='1s'>This test counts from 0 to 10 in 10 seconds.<br/>2</p> <p dur='1s'>This test counts from 0 to 10 in 10 seconds.<br/>3</p> ... <p dur='1s'>This test counts from 0 to 10 in 10 seconds.<br/>10</p> <p end='10s'>This test is over.</p> </div> G. > -----Original Message----- > From: public-tt-request@w3.org [mailto:public-tt-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Silvia > Pfeiffer > Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 9:41 AM > To: Geoff Freed > Cc: Sean Hayes; public-tt@w3.org > Subject: Re: beginEnd002: par timeContainer and child with no duration > > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Geoff Freed <geoff_freed@wgbh.org> wrote: > > > > > > i agree with sean's explanation, as this is the expected behavior according to dfxp > now. however, when we built ccplayer we implemented things a bit differently-- that is, > a caption that has a begin time but no end time or dur will display until the next > caption displays. at that time, the first caption will erase just before the next > caption appears. so in the case of this: > > > > <p begin='1s'>This test counts from 0 to 10 in 10 seconds.<br/>1</p> > > <p begin='2s'>This test counts from 0 to 10 in 10 seconds.<br/>2</p> > > <p begin='3s'>This test counts from 0 to 10 in 10 seconds.<br/>3</p> > > > > the first caption appears at 1s and is displayed until 2s, at which time it erases and > the second caption displays. at 3s, the second caption erases and the third caption > displays. etc., etc. in dfxp terms, that equals this: > > > > <p begin='1s' end='2s'>This test counts from 0 to 10 in 10 seconds.<br/>1</p> > > <p begin='2s' end='3s'>This test counts from 0 to 10 in 10 seconds.<br/>2</p> > > <p begin='3s' end='4s'>This test counts from 0 to 10 in 10 seconds.<br/>3</p> > > > > > > we did things this way because caption software has not always depended on end times > to erase captions when the captions are timed to appear sequentially without pause. > > > > doing things the first way means less coding, which is convenient. i would lobby for > changing the spec, if it's not a big pain, to permit this behavior not only because it's > less work, but also because caption vendors will probably expect to be able to do things > this way. > > I respectfully disagree. > > To me, upon first reading the first example, it was clear that this > would add a new caption every second, but not remove any of the ones > before. This is a very convenient way of specifying a default end > value of "this last until the video ends whenever it ends". The best > means to support this is by not giving an end value and therefore > allowing it to last "forever". And it allows to have overlapping timed > text that lasts until the end. > > I think that if you wanted a text removed at a certain time, you'd > have to provide an end time. Otherwise you are open to all sorts of > misunderstandings. For example, what would you do with a specification > like this: > > <p begin='1s'>This test counts from 0 to 10 in 10 seconds.<br/>1</p> > <p begin='2s' end='4s'>This test counts from 0 to 10 in 10 seconds.<br/>2</p> > <p begin='3s'>This test counts from 0 to 10 in 10 seconds.<br/>3</p> > <p begin='3s' end='4s'>This test counts from 0 to 10 in 10 seconds.<br/>4</p> > > Would the third one appear at all? > > Best Regards, > Silvia.
Received on Tuesday, 16 December 2008 11:55:50 UTC