RE: DFXP LC Comments - Issue 10 Response; Bert Bos

There simply is no technical reason to depart from the existing subset,
which would introduce an unnecessary discrepancy between DFXP's use of
XSL's named colors. DFXP makes normative use of XSL formatting property
value space and semantics and has departed from this only when
technically necessary. I'm afraid the fact that television people prefer
to use "cyan" than "aqua" is not sufficient cause for a change.

 

G.

 

________________________________

From: John Birch [mailto:Johnb@screen.subtitling.com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 11:05 AM
To: Glenn A. Adams
Cc: W3C Public TTWG
Subject: RE: DFXP LC Comments - Issue 10 Response; Bert Bos

 

Indeed, one can equally well write - 'tts:color = "aqua"' ... but that
wasn't the point :-)

 

There is indeed no technical requirement - but in one important target
'market' for DFXP (one of the areas where an implementation is currently
occurring I might add :-), #0x00FFFF has always been cyan.

 

Are there strong technical reasons not to include the keywords cyan and
magenta when there are equally valid non technical reasons to include
them?

Or is it just a case that this is not the time for such a change?

 

regards

John

	-----Original Message-----
	From: public-tt-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-tt-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Glenn A. Adams
	Sent: 25 August 2005 14:52
	To: John Birch
	Cc: W3C Public TTWG
	Subject: RE: DFXP LC Comments - Issue 10 Response; Bert Bos

	The small set of named colors defined in DFXP is intentionally a
strict subset of those named colors used by XSL 1.0, which in turn, is
based on CSS2, which is based on HTML named colors. There is no
technical requirement to make a change at this time since one can
specify the same information using existing means supported by <color>,
e.g., #RRGGBB or rgb(r,g,b).

	 

	Regards,

	Glenn

	 

	
________________________________


	From: John Birch [mailto:Johnb@screen.subtitling.com] 
	Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 5:36 AM
	To: Glenn A. Adams
	Cc: W3C Public TTWG
	Subject: RE: DFXP LC Comments - Issue 10 Response; Bert Bos

	 

	Glenn, 

	I don't know if it is too late for the following comment....... 

	I have just noticed that the named colors in DFXP use aqua and
fuschia. 
	Would it be possible to add cyan and magenta **as equivalents**
for those two named colours - bringing DFXP more in line with the color
terminology widely used in the broadcast industry ... (both Teletext and
EIA 608/708) use these color names [magenta, cyan]. I also notice that
HTML 4.0 includes these color names.

	Just a minor point - I realise - and one that could be addressed
by a profile... but given some of the target applications of DFXP it
might be 'nice' to include these color names!

	regards John Birch 

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: public-tt-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-tt-request@w3.org]On 
	Behalf Of Glenn A. Adams 
	Sent: 24 August 2005 22:55 
	To: Dave Singer 
	Cc: W3C Public TTWG 
	Subject: RE: DFXP LC Comments - Issue 10 Response; Bert Bos 

	 

	Thanks for the correction. 

	> -----Original Message----- 
	> From: Dave Singer [mailto:singer@apple.com] 
	> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 5:53 PM 
	> To: Glenn A. Adams 
	> Cc: W3C Public TTWG 
	> Subject: Re: DFXP LC Comments - Issue 10 Response; Bert Bos 
	> 
	> 
	> Comment: Issue #10 [1]; 22 Apr 2005 20:44:52 +0200 
	> 
	> 7.1.1) Why must xml:lang be specified? Isn't omitting it the
same as 
	> defining it to be the empty string? 
	> 
	> Response: 
	> 
	> The goal is to strongly encourage authors and authoring
systems to be 
	> explicit about language. Specifying xml:space="" is not the
same as 
	> not specifying xml:space. The former is an explicit authorial 
	> expression of "no default language"; the latter leaves
authorial 
	> intention unexpressed. We wish to enforce some intentional
expression 
	> even if it is "no default language". 
	> 
	> 
	> 
	> ==> that should read xml:lang, not xml:space.  And it may be
worth 
	> saying that the author can use "mul" or "und" for multiple or 
	> undetermined, when they are determined to be indeterminate. 
	> -- 
	> David Singer 
	> Apple Computer/QuickTime 

Received on Thursday, 25 August 2005 15:18:21 UTC