- From: Glenn A. Adams <gadams@xfsi.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 11:18:11 -0400
- To: "John Birch" <Johnb@screen.subtitling.com>
- Cc: "W3C Public TTWG" <public-tt@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <C0A7A8BF0F28BA4B9C6C8816309E1D0702E372@ES1.xfsi.com>
There simply is no technical reason to depart from the existing subset, which would introduce an unnecessary discrepancy between DFXP's use of XSL's named colors. DFXP makes normative use of XSL formatting property value space and semantics and has departed from this only when technically necessary. I'm afraid the fact that television people prefer to use "cyan" than "aqua" is not sufficient cause for a change. G. ________________________________ From: John Birch [mailto:Johnb@screen.subtitling.com] Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 11:05 AM To: Glenn A. Adams Cc: W3C Public TTWG Subject: RE: DFXP LC Comments - Issue 10 Response; Bert Bos Indeed, one can equally well write - 'tts:color = "aqua"' ... but that wasn't the point :-) There is indeed no technical requirement - but in one important target 'market' for DFXP (one of the areas where an implementation is currently occurring I might add :-), #0x00FFFF has always been cyan. Are there strong technical reasons not to include the keywords cyan and magenta when there are equally valid non technical reasons to include them? Or is it just a case that this is not the time for such a change? regards John -----Original Message----- From: public-tt-request@w3.org [mailto:public-tt-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Glenn A. Adams Sent: 25 August 2005 14:52 To: John Birch Cc: W3C Public TTWG Subject: RE: DFXP LC Comments - Issue 10 Response; Bert Bos The small set of named colors defined in DFXP is intentionally a strict subset of those named colors used by XSL 1.0, which in turn, is based on CSS2, which is based on HTML named colors. There is no technical requirement to make a change at this time since one can specify the same information using existing means supported by <color>, e.g., #RRGGBB or rgb(r,g,b). Regards, Glenn ________________________________ From: John Birch [mailto:Johnb@screen.subtitling.com] Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 5:36 AM To: Glenn A. Adams Cc: W3C Public TTWG Subject: RE: DFXP LC Comments - Issue 10 Response; Bert Bos Glenn, I don't know if it is too late for the following comment....... I have just noticed that the named colors in DFXP use aqua and fuschia. Would it be possible to add cyan and magenta **as equivalents** for those two named colours - bringing DFXP more in line with the color terminology widely used in the broadcast industry ... (both Teletext and EIA 608/708) use these color names [magenta, cyan]. I also notice that HTML 4.0 includes these color names. Just a minor point - I realise - and one that could be addressed by a profile... but given some of the target applications of DFXP it might be 'nice' to include these color names! regards John Birch -----Original Message----- From: public-tt-request@w3.org [mailto:public-tt-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Glenn A. Adams Sent: 24 August 2005 22:55 To: Dave Singer Cc: W3C Public TTWG Subject: RE: DFXP LC Comments - Issue 10 Response; Bert Bos Thanks for the correction. > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Singer [mailto:singer@apple.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 5:53 PM > To: Glenn A. Adams > Cc: W3C Public TTWG > Subject: Re: DFXP LC Comments - Issue 10 Response; Bert Bos > > > Comment: Issue #10 [1]; 22 Apr 2005 20:44:52 +0200 > > 7.1.1) Why must xml:lang be specified? Isn't omitting it the same as > defining it to be the empty string? > > Response: > > The goal is to strongly encourage authors and authoring systems to be > explicit about language. Specifying xml:space="" is not the same as > not specifying xml:space. The former is an explicit authorial > expression of "no default language"; the latter leaves authorial > intention unexpressed. We wish to enforce some intentional expression > even if it is "no default language". > > > > ==> that should read xml:lang, not xml:space. And it may be worth > saying that the author can use "mul" or "und" for multiple or > undetermined, when they are determined to be indeterminate. > -- > David Singer > Apple Computer/QuickTime
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2005 15:18:21 UTC