- From: Charles Wiltgen <lists@wiltgen.net>
- Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 09:01:01 -0800
- To: List € W3C Timed Text <public-tt@w3.org>
Al Gilman wrote... > We want to [...] use XML for what it helps us with but not slavishly use XML > if in the end it is seriously getting in the way. It would be an interesting choice to burden TT with a new format that's not well-understood, doesn't have wide support in authoring tools, languages and OS vendors, etc. I know that I won't personally have any use for TT if it's not XML-based, and in my experience most people will feel the same way. > The requirements for 'capture' are more severe than for 'authoring.' The requirements of /the TT format/ for realtime-captured text are actually much simpler and more straightforward than those for "authored" timed text presentations. > The TT format should meet the needs of the MMI group to support real time > collaboration among geographically distributed people. A file format can't support realtime collaboration, but tools that use that file format can. -- Charles Wiltgen <http://playbacktime.com/>
Received on Saturday, 8 February 2003 12:01:04 UTC