- From: Glenn A. Adams <glenn@xfsi.com>
- Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 01:06:22 -0500
- To: "Charles Wiltgen" <lists@wiltgen.net>, List ? W3C Timed Text <public-tt@w3.org>
There is a problem with the proposal below, which is that it requires that the timing containment and ordering relationships be congruous with the layout/formatting (box model) relationships; however, in general, this is not the case. This can potentially be handled, albeit, with a loss of generality, by flattening out either the timing model or the formatting model, i.e., assigning fixed times or positions to every element. As an example, consider the case: <ol> <li>Gold Winner</li> <li>Silver Winner</li> <li>Bronze Winner</li> </ol> vs <seq> <p>Bronze Winner</p> <p>Silver Winner</p> <p>Gold Winner</p> </seq> The natural layout order turns out to be reverse of the natural timing order. Regards, Glenn > -----Original Message----- > From: Charles Wiltgen [mailto:lists@wiltgen.net] > Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 9:19 PM > To: List EUR W3C Timed Text > Subject: Re: TT and subtitling > > > > John Glauert wrote... > > > * Some semantics should be built in. > > - Language > > Again stealing from a mature specification, here's Proposal 0.0 in two > languages: > > <switch> > <seq systemLanguage="en"> > <tt:p begin="0s" dur="5s">One</tt:p> > <tt:p dur="10s">Two</tt:p> > <tt:p begin="1s" dur="5s" class="important">Three</tt:p> > </seq> > <seq systemLanguage="fr"> > <tt:p begin="0s" dur="5s">Un</tt:p> > <tt:p dur="10s">Deux</tt:p> > <tt:p begin="1s" dur="5s">Trois</tt:p> > </seq> > </switch> > > This could also be done like this, I believe: > > <seq> > <switch> > <tt:p begin="0s" dur="5s" systemLanguage="en">One</tt:p> > <tt:p begin="0s" dur="5s" systemLanguage="fr">Un</tt:p> > </switch> > <switch> > <tt:p dur="10s" systemLanguage="en">Two</tt:p> > <tt:p dur="10s" systemLanguage="fr">Deux</tt:p> > </switch> > <switch> > <tt:p begin="1s" dur="5s" systemLanguage="en">Three</tt:p> > <tt:p begin="1s" dur="5s" systemLanguage="fr">Trois</tt:p> > </switch> > </seq> > > > I would like to add a plea to consider non-text! > > If TT is an extension of SMIL, then we get audio/video > integration for free. > > -- Charles Wiltgen > <http://playbacktime.com/> > >
Received on Saturday, 8 February 2003 01:06:24 UTC