- From: Charles Wiltgen <lists@wiltgen.net>
- Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 21:18:47 -0800
- To: List € W3C Timed Text <public-tt@w3.org>
John Glauert wrote...
> * Some semantics should be built in.
> - Language
Again stealing from a mature specification, here's Proposal 0.0 in two
languages:
<switch>
<seq systemLanguage="en">
<tt:p begin="0s" dur="5s">One</tt:p>
<tt:p dur="10s">Two</tt:p>
<tt:p begin="1s" dur="5s" class="important">Three</tt:p>
</seq>
<seq systemLanguage="fr">
<tt:p begin="0s" dur="5s">Un</tt:p>
<tt:p dur="10s">Deux</tt:p>
<tt:p begin="1s" dur="5s">Trois</tt:p>
</seq>
</switch>
This could also be done like this, I believe:
<seq>
<switch>
<tt:p begin="0s" dur="5s" systemLanguage="en">One</tt:p>
<tt:p begin="0s" dur="5s" systemLanguage="fr">Un</tt:p>
</switch>
<switch>
<tt:p dur="10s" systemLanguage="en">Two</tt:p>
<tt:p dur="10s" systemLanguage="fr">Deux</tt:p>
</switch>
<switch>
<tt:p begin="1s" dur="5s" systemLanguage="en">Three</tt:p>
<tt:p begin="1s" dur="5s" systemLanguage="fr">Trois</tt:p>
</switch>
</seq>
> I would like to add a plea to consider non-text!
If TT is an extension of SMIL, then we get audio/video integration for free.
-- Charles Wiltgen
<http://playbacktime.com/>
Received on Saturday, 8 February 2003 00:18:48 UTC