- From: Charles Wiltgen <lists@wiltgen.net>
- Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 21:18:47 -0800
- To: List € W3C Timed Text <public-tt@w3.org>
John Glauert wrote... > * Some semantics should be built in. > - Language Again stealing from a mature specification, here's Proposal 0.0 in two languages: <switch> <seq systemLanguage="en"> <tt:p begin="0s" dur="5s">One</tt:p> <tt:p dur="10s">Two</tt:p> <tt:p begin="1s" dur="5s" class="important">Three</tt:p> </seq> <seq systemLanguage="fr"> <tt:p begin="0s" dur="5s">Un</tt:p> <tt:p dur="10s">Deux</tt:p> <tt:p begin="1s" dur="5s">Trois</tt:p> </seq> </switch> This could also be done like this, I believe: <seq> <switch> <tt:p begin="0s" dur="5s" systemLanguage="en">One</tt:p> <tt:p begin="0s" dur="5s" systemLanguage="fr">Un</tt:p> </switch> <switch> <tt:p dur="10s" systemLanguage="en">Two</tt:p> <tt:p dur="10s" systemLanguage="fr">Deux</tt:p> </switch> <switch> <tt:p begin="1s" dur="5s" systemLanguage="en">Three</tt:p> <tt:p begin="1s" dur="5s" systemLanguage="fr">Trois</tt:p> </switch> </seq> > I would like to add a plea to consider non-text! If TT is an extension of SMIL, then we get audio/video integration for free. -- Charles Wiltgen <http://playbacktime.com/>
Received on Saturday, 8 February 2003 00:18:48 UTC