- From: <lists@wiltgen.net>
- Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 08:25:08 -0800 (PST)
- To: <public-tt@w3.org>
Johnb@screen.subtitling.com wrote... > ...an XML representation might bring advantages - but it should not be a > pre-requisite. TT must be XML-based for many reasons, among them (1) tools support, (2) API support, (3) easy transformation to arbitrary formats using XSL, (4) integration with other XML applications, etc. > AFAIK SMIL also doesn't allow the implementation of all of the buffering > and timing models (outlined by Glenn A. Adams) that are probably required. From where I sit SMIL would be a good reference to use while defining TT. It sounds like familiar with SMIL, so can you be more specific? -- Charles Wiltgen <http://playbacktime.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 5 February 2003 11:24:16 UTC