Re: Report on the 11th TREE CG Meeting and planning for 2024

Hi all,

The issues have been opened, or comments have been provided on existing 
issues:

  * Issue #85: on graphs vs. trees now going in the direction of 
mandating trees - 
https://github.com/TREEcg/specification/issues/85#issuecomment-1866041506

  * Issue #100: DataService vs. Distribution, and the introduction of 
tree:View as a subclassof a dcat:Distribution - 
https://github.com/TREEcg/specification/issues/100

I think the changes are quite big, but will make the specification so 
much more elegant and user-friendly.

Kind regards,

Pieter

On 20/12/2023 17:29, Pieter Colpaert wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Due to a lot of us being either super busy, either already on 
> holidays, we’ve held a TREE CG meeting with only Sander Van Dooren and 
> I. Nevertheless it has been very productive.
>
>  * We got a new version of the spec out ratifying minor changes we’ve 
> done together in a read-through session
>
>  * We decided on*dates for the 8 next TREE CG meetings* in 2024. The 
> invites were sent out to the mailing list. Please do check whether 
> they get added to your schedules. If this wouldn’t be the case, 
> they’re at 14 CET, always on a Wednesday: the 10th and 24th of 
> January, the 7th of February, the 6st of March, the 3d of April, the 
> 24th of April, the 22d of May and the 19th of June - on the usual link 
> that has been added to all invites.
>
>  * We have been discussing ViewDescriptions, the link to DCAT-AP, the 
> difference between Distribution and DataService, ... and of course the 
> long standing issue on graph vs. search trees. We have made great 
> progress there that Sander and I will present on the 12th TREE CG 
> meeting - If you feel adventurous, you can try to decode our slide 
> notes taken during our brainstorm: 
> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1jOexO8yxLmF4EZ-U3yw8SFwd-wlDtlOpuxjB5QiTmys/edit#slide=id.g2a8951be925_0_38 
> - The gist: we would only allow search trees from now on, with the 
> backwards compatible caveat that you MUST prune backlinks of 1 deep, 
> so we can still support double linked lists.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Pieter
>
> -- 
> https://pietercolpaert.be/
> +32486747122

-- 
https://pietercolpaert.be/
+32486747122