Aleecia, I believe legally articulate purposes would be the same across all companies (for example, profiling with legal effect). There are a host of specific purposes that are not directly addressed in GDPR/ePR so those will need more flexibility. - Shane On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Aleecia M. McDonald <aleecia@aleecia.com> wrote: > I think I understand Shane to suggest that these data use purposes all > need to be custom per-site because what site foo.com defines as “tracking > for targeted ads” may not match what site bar.com defines as tracking for > targeted ads. Yes? > > If this understanding is correct, I don’t see how DNT can support that use > case in any way that leaves it at all useful to actual human users. There > is no meaningful consent possible when users have to read all of the fine > print every time — this becomes a sad farce. > > I believe the motivation for this new work stems from EU purposes as > defined by law (and later case law.) If so, there should not be a > tremendous amount of daylight between what site foo.com and site bar.com > mean by the same terms, since they are set by law / regulation / case law. > > Am I missing something? > > Aleecia > > > -- - Shane Shane Wiley VP, Privacy Oath: A Verizon Company
Received on Thursday, 12 October 2017 17:21:23 UTC