- From: Aleecia M. McDonald <aleecia@aleecia.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 09:11:54 -0700
- To: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org) (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
I think I understand Shane to suggest that these data use purposes all need to be custom per-site because what site foo.com defines as “tracking for targeted ads” may not match what site bar.com defines as tracking for targeted ads. Yes? If this understanding is correct, I don’t see how DNT can support that use case in any way that leaves it at all useful to actual human users. There is no meaningful consent possible when users have to read all of the fine print every time — this becomes a sad farce. I believe the motivation for this new work stems from EU purposes as defined by law (and later case law.) If so, there should not be a tremendous amount of daylight between what site foo.com and site bar.com mean by the same terms, since they are set by law / regulation / case law. Am I missing something? Aleecia
Received on Thursday, 12 October 2017 16:12:18 UTC