- From: Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) <mts-std@schunter.org>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 18:47:54 +0200
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
Dear TPWG, for those who do not remember what a call for objection was about, here is some guidance. The goal is to find a consensus that people "can live with". The procedure is that anyone can provide "substantiated objections" to any of the (two) alternatives. The chairs will analyze the inputs and will try to identify the alternative with "least substantiated objections". Substantiated means that you should provide evidence/data/sound arguments if possible (preferences/opinions usually have less weight). Objections means that you should explain why your industry / company / stakeholders cannot live with this option. I hope this guidance helps adding data. If you have further questions, do not hesitate to ask... Regards, matthias On 02.06.2017 21:03, Wendy Seltzer wrote: > Hi TPWG, > > At Matthias's request, in Bert's absence, I've opened a Call for > Objections on the "Other Party property," a proposal to close github > Issue 22[1]. > > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/49311/Issue22/ > > Responses to the Call for Objections are requested by Monday, June 12. > > Thanks, > --Wendy > > > [1] https://github.com/w3c/dnt/issues/22 >
Received on Monday, 5 June 2017 16:48:27 UTC