- From: Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) <mts-std@schunter.org>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 11:27:43 +0200
- To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Rob van Eijk <rob@blaeu.com>
- Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Hi Folks, unfortunately, the deadline for fine-tuning proposals has passed. I took Rob's text proposal from the list that I received before the deadline (yesterday 9am Germany). I also included the "close without spec change" proposal from Shane. I am sorry if I overlooked any other concrete text submission for this CfO. If this is the case, please point me to the submission mail in the archives... Regards, matthias PS: We spent 2 months fine-tuning this single field which caused us to deviate from the time-line. Since the main goal is to get the spec out for implementors, I believe that publishing a CR in June should be our top priority. So please pardon my undue haste. On 01.06.2017 22:34, David Singer wrote: > > > Sent from my iPad > > On May 28, 2017, at 7:58 PM, Rob van Eijk <rob@blaeu.com > <mailto:rob@blaeu.com>> wrote: > >> RE: Gentle reminder / text inputs to CfO Dear all, >> >> I had input from Mike which we merged with my first text proposal. As >> a fallback that original text proposal is still valid, but personally >> I think the following revised text is more futureproof and fit for >> purpose. >> >> REVISED TEXT PROPOSAL >> >> [new] 6.5.7 Other-Parties Property (to be added after the existing >> definition of the “same-party” property) >> >> >> >> An origin server may send a property named “otherParties” to >> distinguish those domains that it claims it may embed but not subject >> to its own control (i.e. not referenced by the same-party property and >> do not share the same data controller indicated by the “controller” >> property). >> > > > This allows the site to embed a completely random list which I cannot > trust to tell me anything, even by omission. Embedded sites may or may > not be mentioned here. What is this telling anyone? What constraint is > the publisher of this field under that a reader can rely on? >> >> The “otherParties” property contains either an array of strings >> representing a list of domain names, or an array of objects each with >> a string property “domain” whose value represents a particular domain >> name. >> >> An origin server MAY use partial wildcards in domain names, e.g. >> *.otherparty.com <http://otherparty.com> (which matches any resource >> on the host or any of its subdomains (and any of its subdomains' >> subdomains, and so on)). The named component must not represent a >> top-level domain. >> >> When the array of objects form is used an origin server MAY include >> other properties, e.g. information based on the modalities of the >> collection, its purpose, and the controller responsible for the domain. >> >> >> >> Examples (to go at end of 6.5): >> >> { >> >> “otherParties”: [ >> >> “www.example.com <http://www.example.com>”, >> >> “*.analytics.org <http://analytics.org>”, >> >> “socialwidgit.com <http://socialwidgit.com>” >> >> ] >> >> } >> >> >> >> { >> >> “otherParties”: [ >> >> { >> >> “domain”: “www.example.com <http://www.example.com>”, >> >> “category”: [“functional”] >> >> }, >> >> { >> >> “domain”: “*.analytics.org <http://analytics.org>”, >> >> “category”: [“analytics”] >> >> }, >> >> { >> >> “domain”: >> “socialwidgit.com <http://socialwidgit.com>”, >> >> “category”: [ “advertising”, ”analytics”] >> >> } >> >> ] >> >> } >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Original message----- >> *From:* Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) >> *Sent:* Sunday, May 28 2017, 7:51 pm >> *To:* public-tracking@w3.org <mailto:public-tracking@w3.org> >> (public-tracking@w3.org <mailto:public-tracking@w3.org>) >> *Subject:* Gentle reminder / text inputs to CfO >> >> Hi Folks, >> >> by Monday 9am Pacific, all text proposals for the call for objections >> must have been sent to the mailing list. >> I suggest to mark inputs with [CfO-input] to emphasize them. >> >> If I do not receive any text proposals by this deadline, I consider that >> we reached a consensus to close this issue without changing the draft. >> >> Regards, >> matthias >> >> >>
Received on Friday, 2 June 2017 09:28:16 UTC