Re: Gentle reminder / text inputs to CfO

Sent from my iPad

> On May 28, 2017, at 7:58 PM, Rob van Eijk <rob@blaeu.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> I had input from Mike which we merged with my first text proposal. As a fallback that original text proposal is still valid, but personally I think the following revised text is more futureproof and fit for purpose.
> 
> REVISED TEXT PROPOSAL
> [new] 6.5.7 Other-Parties Property (to be added after the existing definition of the “same-party” property)
>  
> An origin server may send a property named “otherParties” to distinguish those domains that it claims it may embed but not subject to its own control (i.e. not referenced by the same-party property and do not share the same data controller indicated by the “controller” property).
> 


This allows the site to embed a completely random list which I cannot trust to tell me anything, even by omission. Embedded sites may or may not be mentioned here. What is this telling anyone? What constraint is the publisher of this field under that a reader can rely on?
> The “otherParties” property contains either an array of strings representing a list of domain names, or an array of objects each with a string property “domain” whose value represents a particular domain name.
> 
> An origin server MAY use partial wildcards in domain names, e.g. *.otherparty.com (which matches any resource on the host or any of its subdomains (and any of its subdomains' subdomains, and so on)). The named component must not represent a top-level domain.
> 
> When the array of objects form is used an origin server MAY include other properties, e.g. information based on the modalities of the collection, its purpose, and the controller responsible for the domain.
> 
>  
> 
> Examples (to go at end of 6.5):
> 
> {
> 
> “otherParties”: [
> 
>                             “www.example.com”,
> 
>                               “*.analytics.org”,
> 
>                               “socialwidgit.com”
> 
>                          ]
> 
>                }
> 
>  
> 
> {
> 
> “otherParties”: [
> 
>                            {
> 
> “domain”:  “www.example.com”,
> 
> “category”: [“functional”]
> 
>                                          },
> 
>                            {
> 
> “domain”:  “*.analytics.org”,
> 
> “category”: [“analytics”]
> 
>                                          },
> 
>                                           {
> 
>                                              “domain”:  “socialwidgit.com”,
> 
> “category”: [ “advertising”, ”analytics”]
> 
>                                          }
> 
>                        ]
> 
>                }
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original message-----
> From: Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
> Sent: Sunday, May 28 2017, 7:51 pm
> To: public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)
> Subject: Gentle reminder / text inputs to CfO
> 
> Hi Folks,
> 
> by Monday 9am Pacific, all text proposals for the call for objections
> must have been sent to the mailing list.
> I suggest to mark inputs with [CfO-input] to emphasize them.
> 
> If I do not receive any text proposals by this deadline, I consider that
> we reached a consensus to close this issue without changing the draft.
> 
> Regards,
> matthias
> 
> 
>