W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > July 2017

Re: status of Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) Editor's Draft

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2017 13:11:33 -0700
Cc: tracking protection wg <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-Id: <9686A29A-F0D4-4510-A037-F116FDD6E09F@gbiv.com>
To: Mike O'Neill <michael.oneill@baycloud.com>
> On Jul 2, 2017, at 9:04 AM, Mike O'Neill <michael.oneill@baycloud.com> wrote:
> Thanks Roy for this impressive amount of work. I will read it carefully. For
> now I like the API name change which is certainly better than "exceptions",
> though it might upset some webappsec folk who are already working on a
> Permissions API.

Oh, cr*p! I completely forgot about that proposal.

> We (David Singer I think it was) suggested the term way
> back anyway.

Yep, that's why ... argh ... I had started with s/exception/override/g but
wasn't quite happy with that because I didn't have time to move it into
its own interface.  For example,


Would that be okay, or should I just revert back to exceptions?
Easier now than later.

> There might be mileage in merging these APIs sometime in the future (after
> we finish this obviously).
> Here is the current draft of the Permissions API
> https://w3c.github.io/permissions/
> BTW it is also a bit stingy on explaining Promises, though they do have a
> reference to the guide.

That's what it is supposed to look like when the common form of defining
promises is used; it means not having to re-explain promises in every spec.

Received on Sunday, 2 July 2017 20:12:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:40:36 UTC