Re: Issue 12: Javascript API to return promises instead of nothing.

On 2017-01-24 09:36, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) wrote:
> My understanding is that the second option is the only one that allows
> us to meet our chartered goal to simplify compliance with emerging EU
> regulations. In this case, we are free to update anything including the
> JAvascript API (as long as we can then implement and validate it).
> 
> Any opionions/feedback?

I concur. I don't think this issue requires such a fundamental change 
though. We already have the SAME-PARTY flag (optional, I'd like it to be 
mandatory) that can be express some of these nuances.

Regards,

  Walter

Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2017 09:31:45 UTC